Steady-State Temperature Distribution of a circular disk

rhouli67
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A circular disc of radius a is heated in such a way that its perimeter r=a has a steady temperature distribution A+B \cos ^2 \phi where r and \phi are plane polar coordiantes and A and B are constants. Find the temperature T(\rho, \phi) everywhere in the region \rho < a

2. The attempt at a solution
I have been able to come to a few conclusions. First i assumed we should use the diffusion equation
\nabla ^2 u = \frac{1}{\alpha ^2} \frac{\partial u}{\partial t}

Since we are talking about a steady state problem
\frac{\partial u}{\partial t} = 0
and thus we get the Laplace
\nabla^2 u = 0
Laplaces equation in 2d polar coordinates is
\nabla ^2 u = \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}\left ( r \frac{\partial u}{\partial r} \right ) + \frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial ^2 u}{\partial \phi ^2}
and we assume a solution of the form
u = R(r) \Phi(\phi)
and thus
\frac{1}{R}\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}\left ( r \frac{\partial R}{\partial r} \right ) + \frac{1}{\Phi}\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial ^2 \Phi}{\partial \phi ^2} = 0
\frac{r^2}{R}\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}\left ( r \frac{\partial R}{\partial r} \right ) + \frac{1}{\Phi}\frac{\partial ^2 \Phi}{\partial \phi ^2} = 0
and thus
\frac{\partial^2 \Phi}{\partial \phi^2} + n^2 \Phi = 0 \rightarrow \Phi = c_1 cos(n\phi) + c_2 sin(n\phi)
and
r^2\frac{\partial^2 R}{\partial r^2} - n^2 R = 0 \rightarrow R = e^n + e^{-n}
and the solutions for u become
u = \{ (e^n + e^{-n})cos(n\phi) \}, \{ (e^n + e^{-n})sin(n\phi) \}

This is how far i have gotten. I am not sure if it is completley correct. If it is any hints on where to go from here would be great. Thanks a bunch!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am currently working on the same problem exactly and I came up with the same general solution. I tried to apply the boundary conditions when r=a, but that got me nowhere useful and I can't think of any other useful boundary conditions to apply.

The only place where I was able to eliminate one part of the solution is when you look at the exponential solutions when n goes to infinity, one of the exponentials gives an unphysical result.
 
How i looked at it was the temperature at the center of the disk could no approach infinity so i eliminated the e^n term. Since the Distribution is based on a cos^2 term maby we can eliminate the sin term as well. Giving us u = c_1e^{-n}cos(n \phi) where c_1 is some constant. Not sure where to go from there then though.
 
I saw somewhere online that the Fourier series expansion can be used to find the coefficients. If you notice, the solution with only the e-n term but including both the sine and cosine terms resembles the Fourier series expansion. Then the coefficients can be found using the formula to find the coefficients for the Fourier series. Unfortunately when I tried that I had both an and bn terms come out to zero, which I don't think is correct.
 
ok, so I reread the online source, first the exponential should be a power function in the form r^{n} and r^{-n} and then the r^{-n} term should be removed because this blows up when r=0.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top