Stress in a concrete support column

comicnabster
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



As quoted from the question sheet:
When building a tall support, often the self weight of the support must be considered. For an optimal support, the volume of material, and hence the cost, will be a minimum. If the maximum allowable stress in concrete is 12 MPa, determine the optimal geometry of a column 100 metres tall made of concrete to support a mass of 1000 tonnes at its top. (Hint: think of the shape of the CN tower)

(from a table of values) The weight per cubic meter of concrete is 24 kN/m^3, or 24000 N/m^3.

Use 9.81 m/s^2 as the value of gravitational acceleration.

Homework Equations



Stress = Force per area = F/A

A of a circle = pi(d^2)/4, where d is the diameter

Volume of a cylinder = Ah, A = pi(d^2)/4

The Attempt at a Solution



1000 tonnes = 1.0 E6 kg, so the weight of the mass = 1E6 kg x g = 9.81E6 N
Maximum stress of concrete is 12 MPa = 12E6 Pa
12E6 Pa = (9.81E6 N + (100m)pi(r^2)(24000 N/m^3))/(pi*r^2)
Radius of column = 0.57 m

Is that the correct approach? Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi comicnabster! :smile:

Hint: the CN tower is tapered (different cross-sections all the way up). :wink:
 
Thanks, but now I have another question - how do I find the volume of a trapezoidal cylinder prism? I know how to find the volume of a trapezoidal straight-edge prism but not for the type where the bases are two circles of different areas.
 
All right, I think I got it this time!

So the stress is actually uniform throughout the column, thus it must also be 12 MPa at the top.

I used integration to get the volume of the column (revolve around x-axis).

Conclusion: Lower radius = 0.527 m, upper = 0.510 m
 
comicnabster said:
So the stress is actually uniform throughout the column, thus it must also be 12 MPa at the top.

I used integration to get the volume of the column (revolve around x-axis).

That's right … if the tower is to be minimal, the stress will be the safe maximum all the way up! :smile:

btw, the question asks for the "optimal geometry" … so what is the shape? :wink:
 
I described it as a cone with the top end cut off
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top