String Theory-Virasoro Generators -- show commutator relation

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



(I have dropped the hats on the ##\alpha_{n}^{u}## operators and ##L_{m}##)

##[\alpha_{n}^u, \alpha_m^v]=n\delta_{n+m}\eta^{uv}##
##L_m=\frac{1}{2}\sum\limits_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} : \alpha_{m-n}^u\alpha_{n}^v: \eta_{uv}-\delta_{m,0}##

where : denotes normal-ordered.

Show that : ##[\alpha_{m}^u,L_n]=m\alpha_{m+n}^u##

Homework Equations



see above

The Attempt at a Solution



For a given ##n## we are looking at the following commutator: ##[\alpha_m,\alpha_{n-m}\alpha_m]##

to use commutator relation:

##[a,bc]=-a[b,c]-[a,c]b##

##a= \alpha_m##
##b= \alpha_{n-m}##
##c= \alpha_m ##

##[a,c]=0##
##[b,c]=(n-m)\delta_{n=0}\eta^{uv}## using (1)

##\implies [\alpha_{m}^u,L_n]=\alpha_m^u(m)\eta^{uv} ## which is wrong...

thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump please. many thanks in advance, very grateful.
 
The commutator relation you've written down is wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes binbagsss
king vitamin said:
The commutator relation you've written down is wrong.

Sorry to re-bump an old thread but I thought it would be a waste to start a new one.
I think I understood this at the time but right now I am not getting it.
Why is the commutator relation wrong?

Let me instead use:

##[a,bc]=[a,b]c+b[a,c]##

##a=\alpha_m##
##b=\alpha_{n-m}##
##c=\alpha_m##

##[\alpha_m, \alpha_{n-m}]\alpha_m + \alpha_{m-n}[\alpha_m,\alpha_m] = m\delta_n \eta^{uv}\alpha_m + m\delta_{2m}\eta^{uv}##

which is wrong..
 
You shouldn't use the same index m for both the \alpha_m and the summed index in the definition of L_n.

So using the (now correct) relation

[a,bc] = [a,b]c + b[a,c]

with

<br /> a = \alpha_m^u \\<br /> <br /> b = \alpha_{n-k}^{\nu} \\<br /> <br /> c = \alpha_k^{\alpha}<br />

you should get the correct answer after contracting with \eta_{\nu \alpha}.
 
  • Like
Likes binbagsss
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top