Stumped by (simple) geometry problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter dextercioby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry
dextercioby
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
13,388
Reaction score
4,035
I've been quite under desperate lately. I got no clue on how to solve this (apparently easy) geometry problem:

Consider a circle C of center O in a plane and a line segment AB not necessarily outside the circle C.
Having no compass, just a pen and a simple ruler, construct 2 points M and N inside the segment AB so that

$$ \frac{AM}{2,333...} = \frac{MN}{1,666...} = \frac{NB}{2} $$

Any ideas?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Note that:- ##MN=\frac{5}{6}NB\\
AM=\frac{7}{6}NB\\
AB=3NB##
Now draw a long line ##BY## from ##B##
Now match one of the endpoints of the scale with the center of the given circle, and using the pen mark the radius of the circle onto the scale.
Now use this distance and mark 18 equidistant points on the line ##BY##. Now join the 18th point with ##A##. Slide the scale along ##BY## and join the remaining points with ##AB## as well. (sliding will make sure all the lines are parallel.)
So now we have divided ##AB## into 18 equal parts. The 6th point will be ##N## and the 11th point along the same direction will be ##M##.
fig-4-6.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
Wow, amazing. It was so simple in the end. So yes, my imagination definitely needs a reset.
Thank you.
 
certainly said:
Note that:- ##MN=\frac{5}{6}NB\\
AM=\frac{7}{6}NB\\
AB=3NB##
Now draw a long line ##BY## from ##B##
Now match one of the endpoints of the scale with the center of the given circle, and using the pen mark the radius of the circle onto the scale.
Now use this distance and mark 18 equidistant points on the line ##BY##. Now join the 18th point with ##A##. Slide the scale along ##BY## and join the remaining points with ##AB## as well. (sliding will make sure all the lines are parallel.)
So now we have divided ##AB## into 18 equal parts. The 6th point will be ##N## and the 11th point along the same direction will be ##M##.
View attachment 83272
Is there a way to figure that out from some theorems? Or its something you either should read in some old paper or try and fail until you find out?
 
Shyan said:
Is there a way to figure that out from some theorems? Or its something you either should read in some old paper
Not really. It's mostly logic and practice :-)
[But you could know before-hand the way to divide a line into equal parts. But it's simple enough that it's not necessary.]
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top