What is the relationship between subspaces V and W if V is contained in W?

leilei
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
subspaces and dimension!

Consider two subspaces V and W of R^n ,where V is contained in W.
Why is dim(V)<= dim(W)...?
"<=" less than or equal to
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the only way you get dim(V) = dim(W) is if V=W, if V is strictly contained in W then, then there must be some vector in W that is not in V, let this be w. Now let (v_1,v_2,...v_r) be a basis of V (now I assumed dim(W)=r). Clearly v_1,v_2,...v_r are in W because it containes V, and because w is not in V it must be independent of v_1,v_2,...v_r, so
(v_1,v_2,...v_r,w) is a linearly independent set in W, so dim(W) is at least r+1 (could be more).
 
Just because I can't resist "putting my oar in", I'll echo mrandersdk: If V is a subspace of W, then any vector any V is also a vector in W. Any basis for W spans V and so any basis for V cannot be larger than a basis for W. Since the dimension of a space is the size of a basis, ...

By the way, do you see why saying "subspace V is a subset of subspace W" (they are both subspaces of some vector space U) is the same as saying "V is a subspace of W"?
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top