Calculating Mass Increase of Earth in a Day Due to Solar Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the mass increase of Earth due to solar energy, given an intensity of sunlight at 1.5 kW/m^2. The initial calculations estimate the energy received by Earth in a day, resulting in a mass increase of approximately 3.67 x 10^5 kg. However, a correction is noted that the light should be treated as coming in parallel, requiring the Earth to be considered as a disk rather than a sphere. This adjustment leads to the conclusion that the mass increase should be halved. The participant acknowledges the correction and recalls similar guidance from their lecturer.
quietrain
Messages
648
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


At Earth’s location, the intensity of sunlight is 1.5 kW/m^2. If no energy escapes
Earth, by how much would Earth’s mass increase in a day? (Radius of Earth is
6.37 × 10^6 m.)

The Attempt at a Solution



ok so, at anyone time, half of the Earth is lit.

so surface area lit = 1/2 x 4\Pir2 =
2.55x1014m2

intensity = 1500 W/m2

so energy per second on Earth = 1500 x 2.55x1014 = 3.82 x 1017 J

energy per day = 3.82 x 1017 x 60 x 60 x 24 = 3.3 x 1022

so E = mc2
so m = E / c2 = 3.67 x 105 kgbut the correct answer is half of this. so where did i go wrong? thanks for help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quietrain said:
but the correct answer is half of this. so where did i go wrong? thanks for help!
You are treating the light as being perpendicular to the surface area of the sphere, but it's not. The light comes in parallel. (Treat the Earth as a disk, not a sphere.)
 
ooo! thanks a lot doc! now i remembered my lecturer said this too !
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top