Supernova, energy in the expanding remnant? simple question cant

rwooduk
Messages
757
Reaction score
59
... figure it out


1. if a typical supernova ejects 2 solar masses of matter at a root mean speed of 7000km/s, how much energy is available in the expanding remnant?



2. Homework Equations : unsure



3. The Attempt at a Solution :

E = 1/2 mv^2

then divide by the volume, 4/3(pi)r^3

do not get the correct answer of 6.52*10^-14 J/m^3



the problem is i do not know how big the remnant is so if i find the total energy what do i divide by, there is no time given to work out the expansion, but lost with this one, any direction appreciated!

thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question asks about energy, not energy density.
If the given answer is an energy density, the problem statement is wrong, incomplete or there is something else missing.
 
mfb said:
The question asks about energy, not energy density.
If the given answer is an energy density, the problem statement is wrong, incomplete or there is something else missing.

thanks for the reply. that is the complete question and the answer provided, i was assuming (given the answer) that the question wanted energy per m^3, which as you state would be an energy density.

i will ask my tutor for clarification of this and update this thread with an answer.

thanks again.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top