Supersonic airplane emits a sound when right over a listener

AI Thread Summary
A supersonic airplane flying horizontally emits sound directly above a listener, but the sound cannot reach the listener immediately due to the plane's speed exceeding that of sound. The sound travels downward at speed c, but the plane's altitude h and the time Δt it takes for the sound to reach the listener complicate the relationship. The correct formula for the airplane's velocity is v=c/√(1-(c*Δt/h)^2), which indicates that h does not equal c*Δt. The Mach cone generated by the plane means the sound is heard only after the cone passes the observer, leading to confusion about the timing of sound and the plane's position. The problem's setup suggests that the plane's behavior cannot be determined solely based on the sound emitted at the moment it is overhead.
krvolok
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm having a bit of a problem with the following problem:
A supersonic airplane flying at the velocity v is flying horizontally to the ground with altitude h. At the exact moment when the plane is vertically above a listener on the ground, it emits a sound. It takes Δt seconds for the sound to reach the listener. What is the velocity of the airplane if the speed of sound is c.

The solution given is v=c/√(1-(c*Δt/h)^2). It's short so I'm not using latex :)

Anyway, my reasoning is that the sound will go straight down with speed c, since it can't go any faster. But then, this height h=c*Δt, and if you try putting that in the answer bad things happen.

Could someone explain why h =/= c*Δt and how to get that weird proportion. At least give me some hints :)

Thank you very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sound emitted by the supersonic plane cannot travel directly to the ground. Remember, the plane is flying faster than sound can travel. If one were to look up at the moment the plane passed overhead, the plane would be visible (assuming clear skies, etc., etc.) but there would be no sound audible.

The sound from the plane cannot be heard until the Mach cone generated by the plane passes the observer on the ground.

For more info:

http://wordpress.mrreid.org/2012/12/15/sonic-booms-and-mach-cones/

http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/machang.html
 
But the plane is assumed to be perfectly silent, and then emits a bang. Obviously the bang will lag behind the plane since the sound can't go any faster, but how is the vertical component affected at all?
 
It appears to me that the problem is misstated. I've seen similar problems where the scenario has the sound from the plane reaching the listener at the instant the plane is overhead. Then the problem is solvable since you have a race between the plane and the sound along linear paths at fixed velocities.

As the problem stands nothing can be said about the speed of the plane. It could disappear entirely after emitting the sound overhead and no information in the problem would change. It could stand still overhead and still no information would change.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top