Surface density of stars in a Galaxy

AI Thread Summary
The scale length of a galaxy's disk is defined as the distance over which the surface density of stars decreases by a factor of e. In this discussion, the surface density decreases by a factor of 10 over 9 kpc, leading to a calculated scale length of 9 kpc. The formula for surface density is σ(r) = σ0e−r/h, where σ0 is the central surface density and h is the scale length. A participant questions the assumption that e equals 10, indicating a potential misunderstanding of mathematical constants. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately interpreting the relationship between surface density and scale length in galactic structures.
Barbequeman
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
The surface density of stars in a galaxy at a radius of 1 kpc from the centre is 100 Msun/pc^2. The surface density at 10 kpc is 10 Msun/pc^2. Assuming that the surface density of stars is given by the exponential law, calculate
(a) The scale length of the disk.
(b) The surface density at the centre of the galaxy.
Relevant Equations
σ(r) = σ0e−r/h
a.)
The scale length of the disk is the length over which the surface density of stars decreases by a factor of e. In this case, the surface density decreases by a factor of 10 over a distance of 9 kpc, so the scale length is 9 kpc. The surface density of stars at a radius of r from the center of the disk is given by: σ(r) = σ0e−r/h where σ0 is the central surface density and h is the scale length of the disk. We can rearrange this equation to solve for h: h = −r/ln(σ(r)/σ0) plugging in the values from the question, we get: h = −9 kpc/ln(10/100)
h = 9 kpc
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Barbequeman said:
The scale length of the disk is the length over which the surface density of stars decreases by a factor of e. In this case, the surface density decreases by a factor of 10 over a distance of 9 kpc, so the scale length is 9 kpc.
Ummm, back up a second. So you are saying that ##e = 10##?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top