Surface Integral Calculation for Parabolic Cylinder on Circular Area

beyondlight
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
How do i calculate the surface integral

∫∫xdS where z=x^{2} is the parabolic cylinder
over the area x^{2}+y^{2}=1I do not know how to solve this task because i can't express the surface parametrization in r(x,y).

But when i express it as g(x,z)=0 i get the double integral dependet on dxdz. But i can't use this when the circular transformation is rdrdθ=dxdyHelp!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not just muscle-through it in cartesian coordinates first. So you have a surface integral of a function of three variables f(x,y,z)=x over the surface z=g(x,y)=x^2 that is above the region x^2+y^2=1 in the x-y plane. How would that surface integral look in terms of dydx?
 
I do not know how to do it.

r=xi + yj +zk

z=x^2

or

g(x,z)=z-(x^2/2)

is the only thing popping out of my head right now...
 
beyondlight said:
I do not know how to do it.

You gotta' look in the book dude:

\mathop\iint\limits_{\begin{array}{cc}z=f(x,y)=x^2\\x^2+y^2=1\end{array}} x ds=\mathop\iint\limits_{x^2+y^2=1} x \sqrt{(f_x)^2+(f_y)^2+1}dA=\mathop\iint\limits_{x^2+y^2=1} x \sqrt{(f_x)^2+(f_y)^2+1}dydx

Now I bet you can then convert that last double integral into an explicit one in terms of just x and y for now with upper and lower limits as well as compute those simple partials right?
 
df/dx = 2x

df/dy = 0

sqrt(4x^2 + 1)


The primitive is ((4x^2+1)^1.5)/12

Integration limits over y is then -1 and 1. And -sqrt(1-y^2) and sqrt(1+y^2) over x.

If I am right, then i do not know how to solve the integral involving dx. It looks like it results into zero because of symmetry. (x^2, positive for both limits)



im doing my best, help me out if you want.
 
You got the limits conceptually right but reversed:

\mathop\iint\limits_{x^2+y^2=1} x\sqrt{4x^2+1}dydx=\int_{-1}^{1} \int_{-\sqrt{1-x^2}}^{\sqrt{1-x^2}} x \sqrt{4x^2+1} dydx

and I agree with you: because of symmetry, that's zero.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top