Surface Integral setup and evaluate

Thanks again,MacIn summary, we are asked to evaluate the surface integral ∫∫f(x,y,z)dS using an explicit representation of the surface. The function f(x,y,z) is given as x^2 + y^2, and the surface S is defined as the paraboloid z = x^2 + y^2 for 0≤z≤4. Using the formula ∫∫S f(x,y,z)dS = ∫∫D f(x,y,g(x,y))√(1 + (∂g/∂x)^2 + (∂g/∂y)^2) dx dy, we set up the integral but encounter difficulties. After some attempts
  • #1
MacLaddy
Gold Member
291
11

Homework Statement



Evaluate the surface integral ∫∫f(x,y,z)dS using an explicit representation of the surface.

[itex]f(x,y,z) = x^2 + y^2;\mbox{ S is the paraboloid } z= x^2 + y^2\mbox{ for }0\leq z \leq 4[/itex]

Homework Equations



[itex]\displaystyle \int \int_{S} f(x,y,z)\ dS = \int \int_{D} f \{x,y,g(x,y)\}\ \sqrt{1 + (\frac {\partial g}{\partial x})^{2} + (\frac {\partial g}{\partial y})^{2}}\ dx\ dy[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



This is how I have set it up so far. I seem to have gotten stuck, and it makes me think that there is something wrong with my set-up.

[itex]dS=\sqrt{4x^2+4y^2+1}dA[/itex]

[itex]\int\int(x^2+y^2)*2*\sqrt{x^2+y^2+\frac{1}{4}}dA[/itex]

[itex]2\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^2(r^2)*(r^2+\frac{1}{4})^{1/2}rdrd\theta[/itex]

[itex]2\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^2(r^3)*(r^2+\frac{1}{4})^{1/2}drd\theta[/itex]

Please let me know if you see any errors in my work, and if I am on the right track perhaps a gentle nudge on how to integrate this mess.

Thanks,
Mac
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
MacLaddy said:
[itex]2\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^2(r^2)*(r^2+\frac{1}{4})^{1/2}rdrd\theta[/itex]
[itex]2\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^2(r^2)*(r^3+\frac{1}{4})^{1/2}drd\theta[/itex]
That last step is definitely wrong. try a substitution to get rid of the surd. Something like r = tan(ψ)/2 or sinh(ψ)/2.
 
  • #3
haruspex said:
That last step is definitely wrong. try a substitution to get rid of the surd. Something like r = tan(ψ)/2 or sinh(ψ)/2.

Just to clarify; the last correct step was [itex]2\int\int(x^2+y^2)\sqrt{x^2+y^2+\frac{1}{4}}dA[/itex]? So converting to polar was incorrect?

Okay, now that I've looked up "surd," (great word by the way), I'll try to proceed. Just wanted to verify what the last correct step was.

*EDIT* Nevermind, I see what you mean in the last step. That was a type error, the r3 was supposed to be outside the square root. I have fixed the original post.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
So trying a trig substitution I get,

[itex]2\int\int(r^3)\sqrt{r^2+\frac{1}{4}}drd\theta[/itex]

[itex]\mbox{for }a^2+x^2\mbox{ let }x=atan\theta[/itex]

[itex]r=\frac{1}{2}tan\theta[/itex]

[itex]dr=\frac{1}{2}sec^2\theta d\theta[/itex]

[itex]2\int\int(\frac{1}{2}tan\theta)^3\sqrt{\frac{1}{4}tan\theta}\frac{1}{2}sec^2\theta d\theta d\theta[/itex]

Problem with this method is that there are two [itex]d\theta[/itex]'s, which of course is wrong.

Where did I go wrong? (other then everywhere)

Thanks,
Mac

*This has been edited since the original writing. I figured out why I had an extra "r."
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Well, looking above I was obviously tired last night when I wrote that. However, I'm still not positive about this and could use some assistance if possible.

Instead of using [itex]\theta[/itex] again for a substitution, I'll use [itex]\phi[/itex]

[itex]2\int\int(r^3)\sqrt{r^2+\frac{1}{4}}drd\theta[/itex]

[itex]\mbox{for }a^2+x^2\mbox{ let }x=atan\phi[/itex]

[itex]r=\frac{1}{2}tan\phi[/itex]

[itex]dr=\frac{1}{2}sec^2\phi d\phi[/itex]

[itex]2\int\int(\frac{1}{2}tan\phi)^3\sqrt{\frac{1}{4}tan^2\phi+\frac{1}{4}}(\frac{1}{2}sec^2\phi) d\phi d\theta[/itex]

This can be simplified down to,

[itex]8 \phi \int tan^3 \phi sec^3\phi d\phi[/itex]

Still not pretty.

Could anyone verify if this is a correct approach?

Thanks again,
Mac
 
Last edited:
  • #6
MacLaddy said:
Well, looking above I was obviously tired last night when I wrote that. However, I'm still not positive about this and could use some assistance if possible.

Instead of using [itex]\theta[/itex] again for a substitution, I'll use [itex]\phi[/itex]

[itex]2\int\int(r^3)\sqrt{r^2+\frac{1}{4}}drd\theta[/itex]

[itex]\mbox{for }a^2+x^2\mbox{ let }x=atan\phi[/itex]

[itex]r=\frac{1}{2}tan\phi[/itex]

[itex]dr=\frac{1}{2}sec^2\phi d\phi[/itex]

[itex]2\int\int(\frac{1}{2}tan\phi)^3\sqrt{\frac{1}{4}tan^2\phi+\frac{1}{4}}(\frac{1}{2}sec^2\phi) d\phi d\theta[/itex]

This can be simplified down to,

[itex]8 \phi \int tan^3 \phi sec^3\phi d\phi[/itex]

Still not pretty.

Could anyone verify if this is a correct approach?

Thanks again,
Mac

It's a correct approach. There's some details wrong I think, you meant 8π outside the integral in the last step and the numbers don't look right. But there is a much easier substitution than the trig one. Just put u=r^2+1/4.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Dick said:
It's a correct approach. There's some details wrong I think, you meant 8π outside the integral in the last step and the numbers don't look right. But there is a much easier substitution than the trig one. Just put u=r^2+1/4.

Forgive me for being slow here, but if I let [itex]u=r^2+\frac{1}{4}\mbox{then }du=2rdr\mbox { and I have nothing to account for the } r^3;[/itex]

I could do something like this,

[itex] (\frac{1}{2})^3 du=r^3 dr[/itex],

but I've never done that maneuver before, and I honestly don't know if it's valid?

Thanks for the patience and assistance.
Mac
 
  • #8
If I work through it with that substitution I end up with the clean answer of [itex]\frac{4\pi}{3}[/itex], so I'm keeping my fingers crossed that I can do that trick.
 
  • #9
MacLaddy said:
If I work through it with that substitution I end up with the clean answer of [itex]\frac{4\pi}{3}[/itex], so I'm keeping my fingers crossed that I can do that trick.

I'm not sure what 'trick' you are talking about but it doesn't look right to me. I don't get that clean an answer. You've got r^3*sqrt(u)dr=r^2*sqrt(u)*rdr. You'll need the rdr to make du. So that leaves you with just a r^2. But since u=r^2+1/4, r^2=u-1/4.
 
  • #10
MacLaddy said:
[itex]8 \phi \int tan^3 \phi sec^3\phi d\phi[/itex]
Still not pretty.
Beauty is in the eye of beholder:biggrin:. Removing the spurious phi in front:
[itex] \int tan^3 \phi sec^3\phi d\phi = \int sin^3 \phi cos^{-6}\phi d\phi = -\int sin^2 \phi cos^{-6}\phi d cos(\phi) = \int (cos^2 \phi - 1)cos^{-6}\phi d cos(\phi) [/itex]
[itex] = \int (cos^{-4} \phi - cos^{-6}\phi) d cos(\phi) = [-cos^{-3}(\phi)/3+ cos^{-5}(\phi)/5][/itex]
 
  • #11
Dick said:
I'm not sure what 'trick' you are talking about but it doesn't look right to me. I don't get that clean an answer. You've got r^3*sqrt(u)dr=r^2*sqrt(u)*rdr. You'll need the rdr to make du. So that leaves you with just a r^2. But since u=r^2+1/4, r^2=u-1/4.

The trick I was talking about was cubing both sides, like so [itex](\frac{1}{2})^{3} du = r^3dr[/itex]

That accounted for the r3, but it didn't work. I see what your saying in your post, and I can't believe I forgot about simply rearranging my "u" equation. I think I can work through that, but it will not be until later.

Thanks again for the assistance.

haruspex said:
Beauty is in the eye of beholder:biggrin:. Removing the spurious phi in front:
[itex] \int tan^3 \phi sec^3\phi d\phi = \int sin^3 \phi cos^{-6}\phi d\phi = -\int sin^2 \phi cos^{-6}\phi d cos(\phi) = \int (cos^2 \phi - 1)cos^{-6}\phi d cos(\phi) [/itex]
[itex] = \int (cos^{-4} \phi - cos^{-6}\phi) d cos(\phi) = [-cos^{-3}(\phi)/3+ cos^{-5}(\phi)/5][/itex]

Hey, my phi wasn't that spurious! Besides, it did need the eight in front, just with a ∏ instead.

I suppose I'm just not beholden. This question was supposed to be about a surface integral, not some integral that I should be able to simply calculate and have obviously forgotten how.
 
  • #12
MacLaddy said:
The trick I was talking about was cubing both sides, like so [itex](\frac{1}{2})^{3} du = r^3dr[/itex]

Nah, that would give you [itex](\frac{1}{2})^{3} {du}^3 = r^3 {dr}^3[/itex] True, but not very useful.
 

FAQ: Surface Integral setup and evaluate

1. What is a surface integral?

A surface integral is a mathematical tool used to calculate the total value of a function over a two-dimensional surface. It is similar to a regular integral, but instead of integrating over a one-dimensional curve, it integrates over a two-dimensional surface.

2. How do you set up a surface integral?

To set up a surface integral, you first need to define the surface over which you will be integrating. This can be done by parameterizing the surface using two variables, such as u and v. Then, you need to determine the limits of integration for each variable and the function to be integrated over the surface.

3. What is the difference between a surface integral and a line integral?

A surface integral integrates over a two-dimensional surface, while a line integral integrates over a one-dimensional curve. Additionally, the setup and evaluation processes for these integrals are different, as surface integrals require a double integral and line integrals require a single integral.

4. How do you evaluate a surface integral?

To evaluate a surface integral, you can use the double integral formula and apply it to the function and limits of integration determined during the setup process. This involves finding the partial derivatives of the function with respect to the variables u and v, and then solving the integral using techniques such as substitution or integration by parts.

5. In what real-world scenarios are surface integrals used?

Surface integrals have many applications in physics and engineering, such as calculating electric flux and surface area, determining the mass of a curved object, and finding the center of mass for a three-dimensional object. They are also used in fluid mechanics to calculate the flow rate through a surface and in computer graphics to render 3D images.

Similar threads

Back
Top