Surface Integral setup and evaluate

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a surface integral of the function f(x,y,z) = x^2 + y^2 over the surface defined by the paraboloid z = x^2 + y^2, constrained between 0 and 4. Participants are exploring the setup and integration process for this surface integral.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of the surface integral and express uncertainty regarding the correctness of their approaches. There are attempts to convert the integral into polar coordinates, and some participants suggest using substitutions to simplify the integrals. Questions arise about the validity of certain steps and the handling of variables during substitutions.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different methods to evaluate the integral, with participants providing feedback on each other's approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding substitutions and simplifications, but no consensus has been reached on the best method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention potential errors in their setups and calculations, indicating a need for clarification on the integration process. There are also references to specific substitutions that may simplify the integral, but the discussion remains open-ended without a definitive resolution.

MacLaddy
Gold Member
Messages
290
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement



Evaluate the surface integral ∫∫f(x,y,z)dS using an explicit representation of the surface.

[itex]f(x,y,z) = x^2 + y^2;\mbox{ S is the paraboloid } z= x^2 + y^2\mbox{ for }0\leq z \leq 4[/itex]

Homework Equations



[itex]\displaystyle \int \int_{S} f(x,y,z)\ dS = \int \int_{D} f \{x,y,g(x,y)\}\ \sqrt{1 + (\frac {\partial g}{\partial x})^{2} + (\frac {\partial g}{\partial y})^{2}}\ dx\ dy[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



This is how I have set it up so far. I seem to have gotten stuck, and it makes me think that there is something wrong with my set-up.

[itex]dS=\sqrt{4x^2+4y^2+1}dA[/itex]

[itex]\int\int(x^2+y^2)*2*\sqrt{x^2+y^2+\frac{1}{4}}dA[/itex]

[itex]2\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^2(r^2)*(r^2+\frac{1}{4})^{1/2}rdrd\theta[/itex]

[itex]2\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^2(r^3)*(r^2+\frac{1}{4})^{1/2}drd\theta[/itex]

Please let me know if you see any errors in my work, and if I am on the right track perhaps a gentle nudge on how to integrate this mess.

Thanks,
Mac
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
MacLaddy said:
[itex]2\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^2(r^2)*(r^2+\frac{1}{4})^{1/2}rdrd\theta[/itex]
[itex]2\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^2(r^2)*(r^3+\frac{1}{4})^{1/2}drd\theta[/itex]
That last step is definitely wrong. try a substitution to get rid of the surd. Something like r = tan(ψ)/2 or sinh(ψ)/2.
 
haruspex said:
That last step is definitely wrong. try a substitution to get rid of the surd. Something like r = tan(ψ)/2 or sinh(ψ)/2.

Just to clarify; the last correct step was [itex]2\int\int(x^2+y^2)\sqrt{x^2+y^2+\frac{1}{4}}dA[/itex]? So converting to polar was incorrect?

Okay, now that I've looked up "surd," (great word by the way), I'll try to proceed. Just wanted to verify what the last correct step was.

*EDIT* Nevermind, I see what you mean in the last step. That was a type error, the r3 was supposed to be outside the square root. I have fixed the original post.
 
Last edited:
So trying a trig substitution I get,

[itex]2\int\int(r^3)\sqrt{r^2+\frac{1}{4}}drd\theta[/itex]

[itex]\mbox{for }a^2+x^2\mbox{ let }x=atan\theta[/itex]

[itex]r=\frac{1}{2}tan\theta[/itex]

[itex]dr=\frac{1}{2}sec^2\theta d\theta[/itex]

[itex]2\int\int(\frac{1}{2}tan\theta)^3\sqrt{\frac{1}{4}tan\theta}\frac{1}{2}sec^2\theta d\theta d\theta[/itex]

Problem with this method is that there are two [itex]d\theta[/itex]'s, which of course is wrong.

Where did I go wrong? (other then everywhere)

Thanks,
Mac

*This has been edited since the original writing. I figured out why I had an extra "r."
 
Last edited:
Well, looking above I was obviously tired last night when I wrote that. However, I'm still not positive about this and could use some assistance if possible.

Instead of using [itex]\theta[/itex] again for a substitution, I'll use [itex]\phi[/itex]

[itex]2\int\int(r^3)\sqrt{r^2+\frac{1}{4}}drd\theta[/itex]

[itex]\mbox{for }a^2+x^2\mbox{ let }x=atan\phi[/itex]

[itex]r=\frac{1}{2}tan\phi[/itex]

[itex]dr=\frac{1}{2}sec^2\phi d\phi[/itex]

[itex]2\int\int(\frac{1}{2}tan\phi)^3\sqrt{\frac{1}{4}tan^2\phi+\frac{1}{4}}(\frac{1}{2}sec^2\phi) d\phi d\theta[/itex]

This can be simplified down to,

[itex]8 \phi \int tan^3 \phi sec^3\phi d\phi[/itex]

Still not pretty.

Could anyone verify if this is a correct approach?

Thanks again,
Mac
 
Last edited:
MacLaddy said:
Well, looking above I was obviously tired last night when I wrote that. However, I'm still not positive about this and could use some assistance if possible.

Instead of using [itex]\theta[/itex] again for a substitution, I'll use [itex]\phi[/itex]

[itex]2\int\int(r^3)\sqrt{r^2+\frac{1}{4}}drd\theta[/itex]

[itex]\mbox{for }a^2+x^2\mbox{ let }x=atan\phi[/itex]

[itex]r=\frac{1}{2}tan\phi[/itex]

[itex]dr=\frac{1}{2}sec^2\phi d\phi[/itex]

[itex]2\int\int(\frac{1}{2}tan\phi)^3\sqrt{\frac{1}{4}tan^2\phi+\frac{1}{4}}(\frac{1}{2}sec^2\phi) d\phi d\theta[/itex]

This can be simplified down to,

[itex]8 \phi \int tan^3 \phi sec^3\phi d\phi[/itex]

Still not pretty.

Could anyone verify if this is a correct approach?

Thanks again,
Mac

It's a correct approach. There's some details wrong I think, you meant 8π outside the integral in the last step and the numbers don't look right. But there is a much easier substitution than the trig one. Just put u=r^2+1/4.
 
Last edited:
Dick said:
It's a correct approach. There's some details wrong I think, you meant 8π outside the integral in the last step and the numbers don't look right. But there is a much easier substitution than the trig one. Just put u=r^2+1/4.

Forgive me for being slow here, but if I let [itex]u=r^2+\frac{1}{4}\mbox{then }du=2rdr\mbox { and I have nothing to account for the } r^3;[/itex]

I could do something like this,

[itex](\frac{1}{2})^3 du=r^3 dr[/itex],

but I've never done that maneuver before, and I honestly don't know if it's valid?

Thanks for the patience and assistance.
Mac
 
If I work through it with that substitution I end up with the clean answer of [itex]\frac{4\pi}{3}[/itex], so I'm keeping my fingers crossed that I can do that trick.
 
MacLaddy said:
If I work through it with that substitution I end up with the clean answer of [itex]\frac{4\pi}{3}[/itex], so I'm keeping my fingers crossed that I can do that trick.

I'm not sure what 'trick' you are talking about but it doesn't look right to me. I don't get that clean an answer. You've got r^3*sqrt(u)dr=r^2*sqrt(u)*rdr. You'll need the rdr to make du. So that leaves you with just a r^2. But since u=r^2+1/4, r^2=u-1/4.
 
  • #10
MacLaddy said:
[itex]8 \phi \int tan^3 \phi sec^3\phi d\phi[/itex]
Still not pretty.
Beauty is in the eye of beholder:biggrin:. Removing the spurious phi in front:
[itex]\int tan^3 \phi sec^3\phi d\phi = \int sin^3 \phi cos^{-6}\phi d\phi = -\int sin^2 \phi cos^{-6}\phi d cos(\phi) = \int (cos^2 \phi - 1)cos^{-6}\phi d cos(\phi)[/itex]
[itex]= \int (cos^{-4} \phi - cos^{-6}\phi) d cos(\phi) = [-cos^{-3}(\phi)/3+ cos^{-5}(\phi)/5][/itex]
 
  • #11
Dick said:
I'm not sure what 'trick' you are talking about but it doesn't look right to me. I don't get that clean an answer. You've got r^3*sqrt(u)dr=r^2*sqrt(u)*rdr. You'll need the rdr to make du. So that leaves you with just a r^2. But since u=r^2+1/4, r^2=u-1/4.

The trick I was talking about was cubing both sides, like so [itex](\frac{1}{2})^{3} du = r^3dr[/itex]

That accounted for the r3, but it didn't work. I see what your saying in your post, and I can't believe I forgot about simply rearranging my "u" equation. I think I can work through that, but it will not be until later.

Thanks again for the assistance.

haruspex said:
Beauty is in the eye of beholder:biggrin:. Removing the spurious phi in front:
[itex]\int tan^3 \phi sec^3\phi d\phi = \int sin^3 \phi cos^{-6}\phi d\phi = -\int sin^2 \phi cos^{-6}\phi d cos(\phi) = \int (cos^2 \phi - 1)cos^{-6}\phi d cos(\phi)[/itex]
[itex]= \int (cos^{-4} \phi - cos^{-6}\phi) d cos(\phi) = [-cos^{-3}(\phi)/3+ cos^{-5}(\phi)/5][/itex]

Hey, my phi wasn't that spurious! Besides, it did need the eight in front, just with a ∏ instead.

I suppose I'm just not beholden. This question was supposed to be about a surface integral, not some integral that I should be able to simply calculate and have obviously forgotten how.
 
  • #12
MacLaddy said:
The trick I was talking about was cubing both sides, like so [itex](\frac{1}{2})^{3} du = r^3dr[/itex]

Nah, that would give you [itex](\frac{1}{2})^{3} {du}^3 = r^3 {dr}^3[/itex] True, but not very useful.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K