Surface of 2 rotating fluids in a cylindrical container

magicfountain
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In a cylindrical container (with radius R) there are 2 fluids (separated like water and oil, fluid 1 lies under fluid 2) with given volumes V_i, given densities ρ_i.
You let them rotate with respective angular frequencies ω_i.
There is no friction.
Find the functions of form y_i=a_i x^2+b_i (cylindrical coordinates) that describe the surface (y_i) of each of the 2 fluids.
[Ignore cases of the surfaces touching each other or the bottom of the container]2. The attempt at a solution
I was thinking about finding the functions y_i that would minimize the overall energy for the given values.
I wrote down the following:
E=E_{pot1}+E_{pot2}+E_{rot1}+E_{rot2}
This is a function of ρ, ω, V, a_1, b_1, a_2, b_2
But because Volume is conserved, b_i depends on a_i so we can leave out b_i as an argument of the function.
Now we want to minimize the energy by solving the following two equations for the 2 unknown a.
\frac{∂E}{a_1}=0
\frac{∂E}{a_2}=0
By solving this we obtain a_i --> b_i --> y_i(r)

Is "minimizing the energy" a legitimate way of finding a solution for this problem?
I'm being careful, because I tried this on the same problem but exclusively for 1 fluid and it didn't work, because ∂E/∂a was independent of a.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
just in case you need some visualization
attachment.php?attachmentid=52155&stc=1&d=1350819366.png


I've as far as to see, that my current approach also contradicts the observation that the fluids will go to the walls of the container for faster rotations.
This leads me to thinking that i will definitely have to work in the centripetal force.
Maybe one would have to add E=∫dE=∫F_cent*dr to the energy (following from F=dE/dr). This is just a wild guess.
Help is very much appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • fluid.png
    fluid.png
    690 bytes · Views: 529
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top