Swing velocity at highest point

AI Thread Summary
To prevent falling from a swing at the highest point of a 360-degree rotation, the minimum velocity required must ensure that the upward acceleration equals the downward gravitational acceleration of 9.81 m/s². At this point, while vertical velocity is zero, the centripetal acceleration directed toward the center remains crucial. The centripetal force must balance the gravitational force to maintain the swing's motion without falling. The discussion emphasizes that zero velocity does not equate to zero acceleration, as the necessary centripetal force arises from the balance of gravitational and tension forces. Understanding these dynamics is essential for safe operation of the swing.
Slyforce
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A swing is rotates with the distance 5m to the center of rotation. A full 360 degree rotation is possible.

Find the minimal value of the velocity at the highest point, so that the person operating the swing doesn't fall.

Given data:
r = 5m

Homework Equations


Downward accelaration:
x = 0.5 * -9.81 * t^2

The Attempt at a Solution


So that someone never falls from the swing, then the accelaration upward should be 9.81 m/s^2, but at the highest point (x = 0m, y = 5m), there isn't any vertical velocity. Because there is no velocity, the derivative from the vertical velocity at the highest point is 0, meaning that the downward accelaration is greater than the upward accelaration, meaning that the person would fall if not properly secured.

What am I missing here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In circular motion, acceleration is always centripetal, that is, directed toward the center.
 
Wouldn't that mean that the person in the swing will always fall at the highest point?
 
Would not that mean that anything in circular motion will always "fall" into the center?

Does that happen in reality?
 
Hmm if the body doesn't move, the centripetal force must be equal to the gravitational force right?
 
Slyforce said:
Hmm if the body doesn't move, the centripetal force must be equal to the gravitational force right?
Yes, those two forces will be equal here, but it's not because the body "doesn't move".
Because there is no velocity, the derivative from the vertical velocity at the highest point is 0
Zero velocity does not imply zero acceleration. At the highest point, the vertical velocity will be zero, but as others have posted already, the acceleration will be towards the axis of rotation. (You know the formula for this, right?). The centripetal force is the resultant force necessary to provide that acceleration, I.e. it is the sum of the vertical forces (gravity, tension in the rope).
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Back
Top