How Do Wavefunctions in Coordinate and Momentum Spaces Form an Orthonormal Set?

einai
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
What's the wave function in coordinate space Ψx0(x') of a particle (in 1-D) located at a certain position x0? What about the wave function Φx0(p') in momentum space? Now, consider the totality of these wave functions for different values of x0. Do they form an orthonormal set?

The only thing I know is that if I know Ψx0(x'), I can Fourier transform it to Φx0(p')? But what's Ψx0(x')? I'm really confused.

Thanks in advance! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The wavefunction of a particle is a mathematical representation of its quantum state. It is a complex-valued function that describes the probability amplitude of finding the particle at a particular position or momentum.

In coordinate space, the wavefunction is denoted as Ψx(x'), where x' represents the position of the particle and x represents the position variable. This means that the value of Ψx(x') at a specific x' gives the probability amplitude of finding the particle at that position.

Similarly, in momentum space, the wavefunction is denoted as Φp(p'), where p' represents the momentum of the particle and p represents the momentum variable. The value of Φp(p') at a specific p' gives the probability amplitude of finding the particle with that momentum.

Now, if we consider the totality of these wavefunctions for different values of x0, where x0 represents the position of the particle, then yes, they do form an orthonormal set. This means that they are perpendicular to each other and have a magnitude of 1, which is a requirement for a valid wavefunction.

To answer your question, if you know Ψx0(x'), then you can indeed Fourier transform it to obtain Φx0(p'). This is because the Fourier transform is a mathematical operation that converts a function in one domain (coordinate space in this case) to a function in another domain (momentum space). It allows us to switch between representations of the same wavefunction.

I hope this helps to clarify your confusion. If you have any further questions, please feel free to ask.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top