Tackling a Tough Physics Problem: Proton's Turning Point

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the turning point of a proton shot away from an infinite charged plane with a surface charge density of -2.30 *10^-6. Participants suggest using the electric field generated by the charged plane and applying the Lorentz force law to determine the force on the proton. Newton's second law is then used to find the acceleration, followed by kinematics to determine the distance traveled before the proton stops. Clarification is provided that the Lorentz force law simplifies to F = qE when the magnetic field is absent, emphasizing the need to calculate the electric field strength. The conversation concludes with a participant expressing gratitude for the guidance received.
spatel600
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
The surface charge density on an infinite charged plane is - 2.30 *10^-6 A proton is shot straight away from the plane at 2.20*10^6m/s .



How far does the proton travel before reaching its turning point?

I've tried this problem a few times and got 3 different answers...any suggestions?



Thanks so much for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Find the E field due to the charged plane. Use the Lorentz force law to find the force on the proton due to this field. Use Newton's second law to find the acceleration due to the force. Use kinematics to find the zero of velocity.

- Warren
 
We haven't covered Lorentz force law.

Any more tips?

Thanks a bunch.
 
The Lorentz force law is:

\mathbf{F} = q \mathbf{E} + \mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B}

When the magnetic field is zero, it reduces to just

\mathbf{F} = q \mathbf{E}

Given the electric field strength, all you need to do to find the force on a particle is multiply by the particle's charge.

- Warren
 
But what is the E field...its not given...


Any input?


Thanks.
 
Got it...thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top