Stargazing Telescope optical path length vs focal length

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between optical path length and focal length in a three-mirror off-axis telescope design. The user seeks to understand how these two parameters interact, especially when adjusting the distances between surfaces and apertures. They mention using Zemax for optimization, noting that increasing focal length can lead to a reduction in optical focal length when minimizing the RMS radius. The user expresses confusion over the distinction between optical path distance and focal length, indicating a need for clarification on these concepts. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities involved in telescope design and the importance of understanding optical principles.
balaonspace
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi

I am trying to design a three mirror off axis telescope. The free parameters are the offset between the apertures and distance betwen the surfaces.

My question is for a system with 'n' elements/surfaces (n=3 in my case) is there a relation between optical path length and focal length of the system.

I don't want to go too descriptive about this problem. If it might help I can upload a pic in some webpage.

bala
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
the distance between well yes`. if you have one eye on a lens and the other open. Eye with more light will give more distance but less focus. some what a distortion ? or a dispacement of light'. i would like to see it
 
http://img828.imageshack.us/img828/5718/phyfor.png

In this image 'c' (which i interpret as the optical path distance) and 'f' the focal length can be constrained independently.
For example when i design a system with high focal length with optical path, and optimise the same in zemax, the system focal length reduces to optical focal length for a design with smallest 'rms' radius.
I cannot quiet grasp the difference between the two quantities here.
Thank you for reading.
I am not convinced that i explained my problem clearly. let me know if i need to clarify any part.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Back
Top