Temperature and Radioactivity

I know that if a radioactive substance is heated, then the radioactivity is reduced because of the relativistic thermal motion of the atoms.

Is there a formula linking radioactive decay, temperature and perhaps, heat capacity?
 

vanesch

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
5,007
16
I know that if a radioactive substance is heated, then the radioactivity is reduced because of the relativistic thermal motion of the atoms.
The problem is that in order for this to be significant, the thermal energy of the particles needs to be of the order of their rest masses. Now, the rest mass of a single proton or neutron (expressed in energy units) is of the order of 1 GeV. At a temperature of 11 000 K, the average thermal energy of a particle is about 1 eV (that's given by the ratio of the Boltzman constant and the elementary charge). So in order for hydrogen atoms to have thermal energies which make them move relativistically in a significant way, we'd have to heat them to about 11 000 billion degrees. In order to do so for a radioactive nucleus with about 100 protons and neutrons, that's 100 times more even.

But by that time, they are undergoing already a lot of nuclear interactions!
 
906
2
To the first order of magnitude you're looking at something like this

[tex] \lambda' = \lambda / (3/2 kT/mc^2 + 1)[/tex]

where [tex]\lambda[/tex] is the rate of decay, k is Boltzmann constant, T is temperature, and m is mass of the atom.

The effect is there but it's tiny. You'd have to heat the substance to billions of degrees to get anything remotely measurable.
 

Astronuc

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
18,547
1,682
I know that if a radioactive substance is heated, then the radioactivity is reduced because of the relativistic thermal motion of the atoms.

Is there a formula linking radioactive decay, temperature and perhaps, heat capacity?
Relativistic thermal motion would imply an extraordinarily high temperature - some thing beyond normal experience in the terrestrial environment.

Radiation is a nuclear property as opposed to temperature and heat capacity (or specific heat) which are atomic or interatomic properties.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/spht.html

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/temper.html
A convenient operational definition of temperature is that it is a measure of the average translational kinetic energy associated with the disordered microscopic motion of atoms and molecules.
Thermal energies of atoms are on the order of 0.02 eV at about room temperature.
 
To the first order of magnitude you're looking at something like this

[tex] \lambda' = \lambda / (3/2 kT/mc^2 + 1)[/tex]

where [tex]\lambda[/tex] is the rate of decay, k is Boltzmann constant, T is temperature, and m is mass of the atom.

The effect is there but it's tiny. You'd have to heat the substance to billions of degrees to get anything remotely measurable.
Let's see that first approximation again:

[tex] \lambda' = \frac{\lambda}{ \frac{\frac{3}{2}kT}{mc^2} +1}[/tex]

Is that correct?
 

Related Threads for: Temperature and Radioactivity

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
Top