Temperature in Thompon's experiments.

AI Thread Summary
Thompson's experiment involved measuring the temperature rise of a copper foil when struck by electrons accelerated through a 2,000 V potential difference. The temperature increase of 6.0 C indicates an energy transfer from the electrons to the foil, which can be calculated using the equation E_th = mcΔT. The discussion highlights the need to understand the relationship between energy, work, and temperature in this context, with a focus on the kinetic energy of the electrons before impact. The resulting calculation shows that approximately 7.218 x 10^13 electrons strike the foil in 10 seconds. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately analyzing the experiment's results.
elephantorz
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
1. In one of Thompson's experiments he placed a thin metal foil in the electron beam and measured its temperature rise. Consider a cathode-ray tube in which electrons are accelerated through a 2,000 V potential difference, then strike a 10 mg copper foil.

  • How many electrons strike the foil in 10 s, if the foil temperature rises 6.0 C?



2. r = (mv)/(qB)
v = E/B




3. I am really kind of at a loss as to how to set up this...I am not sure I am in the right track, and I don't know if there is an equation that relates temperature with electricity, I am sure there is and if there is I would like to be pointed to it, I think that's really all I need, unless I am completely doing the wrong thing :/

Thanks guys (that includes females :] ).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi elephantorz,

Here are a couple of points that might help:

What will being accelerated through 2000 V do to the electrons?

The temperature rise of this copper must be coming from an energy transfer to the copper. Where and in what form was this energy beforehand?
 
I asked my teacher about this, she pulled out an E_{th}= mc\DeltaT, I remembered this vaguely from Physics I [calc-based], I went back to look at the equation sheet and it seems this included W, I am assuming this is work.

For one, what does the th stand for? I never took this class with her, since I am doing independent study, I took Physics I about...um, maybe 5 yrs ago? So I have a bunch of theoretical questions and just some details like that [I got the answer to the problem but I want to know where it comes from].

But the equation is really ΔE = Q + W, am I to assume there is no work being done? Since it's being accelerated over a distance or ?

Also, I went another way with this, I was trying to find the resistivity of the metal as a function of time, so \rho(T) = \rho_{0}[1 + \alpha[T-T_{0}]]

Could I have potentially done it that way? Or would I have just failed due to lack of information?

I know these are a lot of questions, I'm sorry, the answer though is :

7.218 x 10^(13) electrons.​


I also have a question there, she divides the E_{th} by the Kinetic Energy, I reasoned that maybe this is because the heat created has been transformed into moving energy, but I am not too confident with this reasoning.​

Again, thanks!

EDIT: Also, LaTex seems to be having issues with subscript, the th and the 0 are really subscripts.
 
Last edited:
The formula E^{\rm th}=mc\Delta T gives the temperature rise of the material if you know the energy transferred.

That energy has to be coming from the electrons. Can you calculate their energy before they collided with the copper?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top