Temperature Stresses on Unrestrained Cube

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vatsy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Temperature
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the volumetric strain of a 1m cube heated by 1°C without restraints. The initial calculation suggests a volumetric strain of 3α, but the question arises about the absence of stresses due to the lack of restraints, leading to an assumption of zero strain. It is clarified that the equation used for strain requires modification to account for thermal expansion effects. The correct approach involves adjusting the strain equations to incorporate the effects of temperature change on the material. Understanding these modifications is essential for accurate strain calculations in thermally affected materials.
Vatsy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hii all..

I have a question.Suppose there is a cube of side 1m .It is heated by 1°C. The cube is not restrained in any direction. We are required to find out the volumetric strain.

I am getting it as 3α.

But my question is that since the cube is not restrained , ∴ there should be no stresses in any direction.
∴ εv=(σxyz)(1-2μ)/E
which gives εv=0.

please help..
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Vatsy said:
Hii all..

I have a question.Suppose there is a cube of side 1m .It is heated by 1°C. The cube is not restrained in any direction. We are required to find out the volumetric strain.

I am getting it as 3α.

But my question is that since the cube is not restrained , ∴ there should be no stresses in any direction.
∴ εv=(σxyz)(1-2μ)/E
which gives εv=0.

please help..

The equation you quote for the strain pre-supposes that there are applied stresses on the object.
 
Vatsy said:
Hii all..

I have a question.Suppose there is a cube of side 1m .It is heated by 1°C. The cube is not restrained in any direction. We are required to find out the volumetric strain.

I am getting it as 3α.

But my question is that since the cube is not restrained , ∴ there should be no stresses in any direction.
∴ εv=(σxyz)(1-2μ)/E
which gives εv=0.

please help..

Hi Vasty. Welcome to Physics Forums.
Your equation needs to be modified when thermal expansion and contraction effects are involved, as follows:
(ε_v-3αΔT)=\frac{(σ_x+σ_y+σ_z)(1-2μ)}{E}
Now, can you figure out how the 6 Hooke's law strain equations have to be modified when thermal expansion effects are included?
 
Chestermiller said:
Hi Vasty. Welcome to Physics Forums.
Your equation needs to be modified when thermal expansion and contraction effects are involved, as follows:
(ε_v-3αΔT)=\frac{(σ_x+σ_y+σ_z)(1-2μ)}{E}
Now, can you figure out how the 6 Hooke's law strain equations have to be modified when thermal expansion effects are included?
Thanks a lot... :smile:
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top