Tension and acceleration problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a tension and acceleration problem involving two weights of 200N and 300N connected by pulleys. The participant initially set up free body diagrams and applied Newton's second law but encountered discrepancies in their calculations. They noted that the tension for mass 2 is twice that of mass 1 and that the acceleration for mass 2 is half of mass 1. A key point of confusion was identified regarding the sign convention used in the equations, particularly for mass 2's upward movement. After clarification on the sign error in the equations, the participant was able to resolve their misunderstanding.
freshcoast
Messages
185
Reaction score
1
1. Problem statement/ given data
The weights of the objects are 200N and 300N. The pulleys are essentially frictionless and massless. Pulley P1 has a stationary axle, but pulley P2 is free to move up and down. Find the tensions FT1 and FT2 and the acceleration of each body.

2. Homework Equations .
F=ma

3. Attempt.
I drew a FBD for each mass with m1 going down with down as the positive and m2 going up with up as the positive direction. I know that in this system the tension for mass 2 is twice the tension of mass 1 and that the acceleration for mass 2 is half of mass 1. I have the answer and the explained solution but I don't know how I'm getting a different answer than they are. Can someone check what I am not seeing here? I know if I find the right acceleration I just have to plug that into find the tensions.

29mq1c1.jpg


The answer in the book is a= 1.78m/s^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks to me that your second equation has a sign error.
 
For mass 2? Since that mass is going up shouldn't the upwards be the positive direction? So it would be T - mg ?
 
Yes, that's right. I should have been clearer. I was referring to the second line of your equations where you wrote for m1: FT1 = m1ay + m1g. Check the signs in this equation.
 
Oh I see it now, got it thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top