Tension in rod of a bicycle wheel skewer

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanics of a bicycle wheel's quick release skewer, specifically the tension generated by the locking mechanism involving a rod and an out-of-round disk, referred to as a cam. The tension is influenced by the distance between the disk's centerline and the handle's position, which relates to the cam's arc length. The handle rotates 180 degrees to transition between a released and tightened position, securing the wheel in place. Participants suggest that the tension may follow Hooke's law, with variations due to the cam's shape affecting linearity. A proposed solution involves using a cosine function to model the tension increase as the handle is turned, integrating this function to account for the elastic properties of the rod.
Inventive
Messages
85
Reaction score
12
The locking mechanism of a bike skewer consists of a rod and slightly out of round disk on one side attached to the skewer. A handle is attached to the out of round disk as well Assuming the skewer is nearly snug with the wheel fork, I think the tension is going to be a function of the distance between the centerline of the disk where it is connected to the skewer and the position of the handle which is related to the disks arc length relative to the unlocked position.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you provide another word for "skewer"? I don't think it's what you mean. (Spoke??)
 
sophiecentaur said:
Could you provide another word for "skewer"? I don't think it's what you mean. (Spoke??)
I believe that he is referring to the "quick release" mechanism on the axle where, for instance, the front wheel is attached to the fork.

The handle is perhaps 5 cm in length and 1 in breadth. It is attached to the "out of round disk" which is what I would have called a "cam". In my experience, the cam is hidden inside a somewhat larger than usual nut which is threaded onto one end of the axle. The handle is rotated 180 degrees between a released position and a tightened position where it holds by friction. In the released position, the wheel can be removed from the slots at the end of the fork. In the tightened position, the wheel is firmly affixed and the bicycle is ready to ride.

I would expect the skewer tension to roughly obey Hooke's law with tension directly proportional to the displacement forced by the cam from the position where the parts begin to bind. A slightly out of round cam will have a roughly sinusoidal variation in displacement as a function of handle position. So that will cause one departure from linearity. And I would not expect Hooke's law to be obeyed at all precisely.
 
Thanks for the help
How's this for a possibility
perhaps if i can come up with equation that is "close" in terms of its graph. Ie use a cosine based function where the right angular frequency will mimic the curve so that the bottom portion of functions graph is at the point where the tension begins. then integrate that function over an interval where the pressure is applied. My reasoning us that the cosine function is increasing over the interval 3pi/2 to 2pi and hence would cause an increase in the tension within the rod. if i knew the elastic properties of the rod as a fixed value then y=kx could be written with k being the spring constant and "x" being my cosine function in terms of angular change
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top