Terminal velocity of a falling conducting ring

quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A conducting ring with radius a and mass m is placed in a magnetic field at a height H above the origin of the reference frame. The plane of the ring is parallel to the ground, that is, the normal is directed along the z-axis. The electrical resistance per unit length of the ring is R/(2Pia), so that the resistance of the loop is R. The magnetic field has spatial dependence:

\vec{B} = \frac{B_0}{L}\left(-\frac{\rho}{2} \hat{\rho} + z \hat{z} \right)

where \hat{\rho}, \hat{z} are unit vectors in the usual cylindrical coordinate system.

At a certain time, the ring is dropped and falls due to gravity. The plane of the ring remains horizontal as the ring falls. Find the terminal velocity of the ring.

Homework Equations



We've got Maxwell's equations, F=ma, Lorentz force F=qv X B, etc.

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's my attempt so far:

\nabla \times \vec{E} = -\frac{\partial \vec{B}}{\partial t} \Rightarrow \oint{\vec{E} \cdot d\vec{l}} = -\frac{d}{dt} \int{\vec{B} \cdot \hat{n} \hspace{1mm} da} \Rightarrow E(2 \pi a) = -\frac{d}{dt} \int{B_z \hspace{1mm}da} \Rightarrow E(2 \pi a) = -\frac{d}{dt} \int_0^{2\pi}{d\phi}\int_0^a{B_z \rho\hspace{1mm} d\rho} = - \frac{B_0 a^2 \pi}{L}\frac{dz}{dt}

But dz/dt is just the velocity we're looking for!

Here is where I am now stuck. I have a nice expression for the electric field, E, in terms of velocity, dz/dt =v:

\vec{E} = - \frac{B_0 \pi a v_z}{2L} \hat{\phi}

But the electric field points in the circumferential direction, not the z direction. In terms of finding terminal velocity, I want something to the effect of

\sum F_z = -mg + F_? = ma, where F? is the net force in the z direction due to my induced electric field. From this point it is easy to set ma =0 and solve for v-terminal. But I can't just say something like F=qE, because E points in the wrong direction.

Furthermore, I haven't at all used the fact that the ring is at a height H or that it has resistance R - are those unnecessary bits of information, or am I approaching this entirely wrong? I almost could solve this using conservation of energy, but it's the terminal velocity I want and not clear to me how to find that in an energy formulation of the problem (might be possible, though). So - can anyone help? o:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh, one more note. I also thought of this:

-\frac{d}{dt} \int B \cdot da = -\frac{d \mathcal{E}}{dt}

, i.e. the change in magnetic flux. And then we could use the fact that

\vec{F}_{mag} = I \int d\vec{l} \times \vec{B} = \frac{\mathcal{E}}{R} \int d\vec{l} \times \vec{B}

but then when I do out the cross product I get for the z-component of magnetic force

\vec{F}_{mag} = \frac{B_0 \rho \pi a}{L} \hat{z}

which has no expression for velocity in it. So, how would I go about finding v-terminal from this?
 
quasar_4 said:
\nabla \times \vec{E} = -\frac{\partial \vec{B}}{\partial t} \Rightarrow \oint{\vec{E} \cdot d\vec{l}} = -\frac{d}{dt} \int{\vec{B} \cdot \hat{n} \hspace{1mm} da} \Rightarrow E(2 \pi a) = -\frac{d}{dt} \int{B_z \hspace{1mm}da} \Rightarrow E(2 \pi a) = -\frac{d}{dt} \int_0^{2\pi}{d\phi}\int_0^a{B_z \rho\hspace{1mm} d\rho} = - \frac{B_0 a^2 \pi}{L}\frac{dz}{dt}

You seem to be assuming (without any justification) that \oint\textbf{E}\cdot d\textbf{l}=2\pi aE... is that really true for any old electric field?

quasar_4 said:
Oh, one more note. I also thought of this:

-\frac{d}{dt} \int B \cdot da = -\frac{d \mathcal{E}}{dt}

, i.e. the change in magnetic flux. And then we could use the fact that

\vec{F}_{mag} = I \int d\vec{l} \times \vec{B} = \frac{\mathcal{E}}{R} \int d\vec{l} \times \vec{B}

but then when I do out the cross product I get for the z-component of magnetic force

\vec{F}_{mag} = \frac{B_0 \rho \pi a}{L} \hat{z}

which has no expression for velocity in it. So, how would I go about finding v-terminal from this?

Isn't there also an electric force on the loop?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top