Test Your Knowledge: Laser Light Facts

Delzac
Messages
389
Reaction score
0
hi,

i have this Qns as follows :

which of the following statements about laser is incorrect?

a. Laser light can be focused to a tiny spot.
b. Laser light must be visible.
c. Laser light travels in vacuum at a speed of 3 X 10^8 m/s
d. Laser light can be extremely powerful.
e. Laser light is monochromatic.

-------------------------------------------------------

for (b.) must laser light neccessaryly must be visible? can't it be in a non- visible spectum.

for (d.) the ans seems horrible unsciencetific, although i agree that laser can be powerful.

for (e.), i checked up wikipedia can found this:
"In the physical sense, no real source of electromagnetic radiation is purely monochromatic, since that would require a wave of infinite duration. Even sources such as lasers have some narrow range of wavelengths (known as the linewidth or bandwidth of the source) within which they operate."

what does this whole chunk mean can anyone explain?? what is wave of infinite duration?? and what is monochromatic??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
so what is the correct ans actually?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top