Suggested Textbooks for Physics 8A @ UC Berkeley

AI Thread Summary
Struggling with Physics 8A at UC Berkeley, the student expresses dissatisfaction with the textbook "Essential University Physics" by Richard Wolfson, citing its conciseness and lack of sufficient examples as barriers to understanding. They feel unprepared for discussions and problem-solving due to the disconnect between textbook material and homework assignments. The student seeks recommendations for alternative textbooks and resources for self-study, including solutions manuals and online courses with better explanations. Suggestions include exploring standard texts like Halliday and Resnick, Young, and Knight's "Physics for Scientists and Engineers," as well as utilizing university library resources and online materials like Motion Mountain. Emphasis is placed on the importance of practicing problems and understanding mistakes for improvement.
gobears2009
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am doing poorly in Physics 8A @ UC Berkeley this semester and I would like to do better.

For background info, I've included the course description:
"Introduction to forces, kinetics, equilibria, fluids, waves, and heat. This course presents concepts and methodologies for understanding physical phenomena, and is particularly useful preparation for upper division study in biology and architecture."
The course requires only basic calculus (the school offers another course, Physics 7A, which I hear is HEAVILY calculus-based), and I think my calculus skills are fine.

We use the textbook: "Essential University Physics" (Volume 1) by RICHARD WOLFSON.

For homework assignments, we use the web-based "Mastering Physics" site (which I find to be really annoying and another topic/rant unto itself).


My problem: I don't like the book, and I think it's because it's too CONCISE.
[1] I don't feel like I have a good theoretical grasp of the concepts.
[2] The book only offers one or two lame examples per section, but the problems are always way harder. So I feel really out of place in discussion and study groups. I'll be flipping through the book and lecture notes trying to solve a problem, and when time's up and we go over solutions, many times they involve methods/ideas that I can't find in the book. Like, "How did you know to calculate the integral of force to find the acceleration?"

Can anyone suggest a better book that I could use for self-study?

What other resources can I employ?
- solutions manual [where can I usually get them?]
- any good web resources [courses at other schools with good notes/explanations/problems+solutions?] [websites / web-tutorials?]

I'm sure there are other problems with the book that I can't really place my finger on. Maybe some of you are familiar with the book and can point out other problems, which would help me a lot. If I know what the problem is, then I have a better idea of what to look for in other textbooks to help fill in the gaps.

More background info - here's a list of topics in our syllabus:
kinematics
circular motion
momentum & impulse
center of mass
work + kinetic & potential energy
rotation: kinematics & dynamics (torque, angular momentum, etc)
statics
oscillations
heat & sound
Heat: energy flow, heat capacity; thermal expansion; latent heat
Intro to kinetic gas and ideal gas; heat as K.E.
Kinetic Gas Theory
Thermodynamics, Heat engines and refrigerators
Entropy & 2nd law; individual processes, diffusion & perfusion; Engines, fridges & efficiency
Fluids: hydrostatics (P vs depth), bouyancy; fluid dynamics

Sorry for the wordy post. Thank you very much for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you have access to a university library, just go through lots of different books to see how they explain it. Other standard texts are Halliday and Resnick, or Young. But don't rely on hunting for better explanations alone, do lots and lots of problems. It's ok to guess and get it wrong many many times. Just make sure you figure out after that why your solution was wrong (or not even wrong).
 
gobears2009 said:
My problem: I don't like the book, and I think it's because it's too CONCISE.

You might try Physics for Scientists and Engineers: A Strategic Approach with Modern Physics by Knight,

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0321513339/?tag=pfamazon01-20,

about which some students make the opposite complaint, i.e., that it's too wordy.

As atty says, check your library.
 
Last edited:
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top