Textbook to accompany Susskind's Quantum Entanglement Lectures?

bcbwilla
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
I am just finishing up an undergraduate course on quantum mechanics, and I plan on watching Leonard Susskind's online lectures on http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLA27CEA1B8B27EB67"over winter break. Does anyone have any suggestions about a textbook that may be good to read along with the lectures? I feel like I'd get more out of it if I have one or more introductory texts to read. It doesn't need to be the exact text used for the course, I would just like an introductory book that somewhat parallels the course.

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You might want to check out "Quantum Mechanics: The Theoretical Minimum" by Leonard Susskind and Art Friedman. This book nicely summarizes the basics of quantum mechanics, and it follows closely the lectures given in the video series. It also contains a lot of illustrative examples to help you better understand the concepts. Other books that might be helpful include "An Introduction to Quantum Computing" by Philip Kaye, Raymond Laflamme, and Michele Mosca, as well as "Quantum Mechanics for Scientists and Engineers" by David A. B. Miller.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top