The Accuracy of Simpson's Rule

  • Thread starter Thread starter fonseh
  • Start date Start date
fonseh
Messages
521
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


For part b , Since 3/8 Simpson's rule and 1/3 Simpson's rule can't be applied directly to get the ans , so i have to apply both methods differently .

I
Why my ans is different with the author's one ? Is there anything wrong with my ans ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


n my third attachment , I apply the 1/3 Simpson's rule first ( for interval 0-4) , i get the ans = 3208

Then , I apply 3/8 Simpson's rule ( for interval 0-6) , i get ans = 3597.5 .

Sum of 3208 and 3597.5 = 6805.2 , but , in the author's working , The author apply 3/8 simspon's rule first , followed by 1/3 Simspon's rule , the author get the total ans = 7198.75 ...
 

Attachments

  • 611.jpg
    611.jpg
    58.8 KB · Views: 514
  • 612.jpg
    612.jpg
    75.7 KB · Views: 398
  • 613.PNG
    613.PNG
    6 KB · Views: 468
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello fonseh,

This exercise is an example of applying Simpson's rule. Do you know what that rule is based on ? Do you think it is always approriate to use when you look at a plot of v versus t ? Is it surprising that the deviation of two different subdivisions gives such a 5% deviation ?
 
  • Like
Likes fonseh and Chestermiller
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top