The Accuracy of Simpson's Rule

  • Thread starter Thread starter fonseh
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Simpson's Rule, specifically the 1/3 and 3/8 methods, to solve a numerical integration problem. The user reports different results when applying the methods in varying orders, yielding 6805.2 versus the author's 7198.75. This discrepancy highlights the sensitivity of Simpson's Rule to the choice of intervals and the order of application. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying principles of Simpson's Rule to ensure accurate results in numerical integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of numerical integration techniques, specifically Simpson's Rule.
  • Familiarity with the 1/3 and 3/8 Simpson's Rule methods.
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, particularly integration and function approximation.
  • Ability to analyze and interpret numerical results from mathematical computations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Simpson's Rule in detail.
  • Learn about error analysis in numerical integration methods.
  • Explore other numerical integration techniques, such as Trapezoidal Rule and Romberg integration.
  • Practice solving integration problems using both 1/3 and 3/8 Simpson's Rule to compare results.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, mathematicians interested in numerical methods, and anyone looking to improve their skills in numerical integration techniques.

fonseh
Messages
521
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


For part b , Since 3/8 Simpson's rule and 1/3 Simpson's rule can't be applied directly to get the ans , so i have to apply both methods differently .

I
Why my ans is different with the author's one ? Is there anything wrong with my ans ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


n my third attachment , I apply the 1/3 Simpson's rule first ( for interval 0-4) , i get the ans = 3208

Then , I apply 3/8 Simpson's rule ( for interval 0-6) , i get ans = 3597.5 .

Sum of 3208 and 3597.5 = 6805.2 , but , in the author's working , The author apply 3/8 simspon's rule first , followed by 1/3 Simspon's rule , the author get the total ans = 7198.75 ...
 

Attachments

  • 611.jpg
    611.jpg
    58.8 KB · Views: 535
  • 612.jpg
    612.jpg
    75.7 KB · Views: 415
  • 613.PNG
    613.PNG
    6 KB · Views: 493
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello fonseh,

This exercise is an example of applying Simpson's rule. Do you know what that rule is based on ? Do you think it is always approriate to use when you look at a plot of v versus t ? Is it surprising that the deviation of two different subdivisions gives such a 5% deviation ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh and Chestermiller

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K