The Accuracy of Simpson's Rule

  • Thread starter Thread starter fonseh
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
fonseh
Messages
521
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


For part b , Since 3/8 Simpson's rule and 1/3 Simpson's rule can't be applied directly to get the ans , so i have to apply both methods differently .

I
Why my ans is different with the author's one ? Is there anything wrong with my ans ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


n my third attachment , I apply the 1/3 Simpson's rule first ( for interval 0-4) , i get the ans = 3208

Then , I apply 3/8 Simpson's rule ( for interval 0-6) , i get ans = 3597.5 .

Sum of 3208 and 3597.5 = 6805.2 , but , in the author's working , The author apply 3/8 simspon's rule first , followed by 1/3 Simspon's rule , the author get the total ans = 7198.75 ...
 

Attachments

  • 611.jpg
    611.jpg
    58.8 KB · Views: 546
  • 612.jpg
    612.jpg
    75.7 KB · Views: 427
  • 613.PNG
    613.PNG
    6 KB · Views: 507
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello fonseh,

This exercise is an example of applying Simpson's rule. Do you know what that rule is based on ? Do you think it is always approriate to use when you look at a plot of v versus t ? Is it surprising that the deviation of two different subdivisions gives such a 5% deviation ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh and Chestermiller