Does a Circular Capacitor with a Dielectric Radiate an Electromagnetic Field?

AI Thread Summary
A discussion on the electromagnetic behavior of a circular capacitor with a dielectric reveals that the magnetic field distribution can be derived assuming a constant electric field. The complex Poynting vector is crucial for demonstrating that the capacitor does not radiate an electromagnetic field, as only the real part contributes to radiation. The time-average of the real Poynting vector is highlighted, emphasizing the need for complex conjugation in calculations. Additionally, the total stored energy density and its relationship to the gradient of the Poynting vector are explored. The discussion references Feynman's lectures for further insights into the problem.
Noname
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Member has been warned not to remove the template.
Hi guys,
Consider a circular capacitor with a disk of radius a and plate separation d, as shown in the figure below. Assuming the capacitor is filled with a dielectric constant epsilon and the capacitor is fed by a time harmonic current I0
(a) Find the magnetic field distribution inside the capacitor assuming that the electric field is constant.
(b) Compute the complex Poynting vector and prove that the capacitor does not radiate an electromagnetic field. (Hint: S=(1/2)ExH ; only Re[S ] radiates an electromagnetic field.)
(c) Compute the total stored energy density W and show that far away from the center (kr<< 1): grad(S)-iwW = 0
(d) Find the surface current density as a function of radial distance on the top plate.

I don't really know how to do the (b). I have S=(1/2)ExH. I think I need to write E and H in complex, I have E=Eo*exp(iwt) and H=Ho*exp(iwt). But I can't prove S is only an imaginary part.

Sans titre.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Sans titre.jpg
    Sans titre.jpg
    9.7 KB · Views: 851
Physics news on Phys.org
Normally, for time-harmonic fields the time-average of the real Poynting vector is:

##\langle \mathbf{S} \rangle=\frac{1}{2}\Re\left( \mathbf{E}^{\dagger} \times \mathbf{H}\right)##

So, I guess, the complex Poynting vector you want is ##\mathbf{E}^{\dagger} \times \mathbf{H}##, i.e. you are missing the complex conjugation (which will remove ##\exp\left(i \omega t\right)##)
 
Feynman treats this problem, (without the dielectric material), in his lectures. See Fig. 27-3 and thereabouts. http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_27.html ## \\ ## He uses a slightly different type of units, but you should find it good reading.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top