The electric field of a charged semicircle from its electric potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric field E(r) from the electric potential V(r) for a uniform line charge on a semicircle. The potential is derived as V(z) = K*Q/Sqrt(z^2 + R^2), where Q = λπR and K is the electric constant. It is noted that simply using E = - grad(V) leads to only one component of the electric field, necessitating a full potential expression V(x,y,z) to compute the field accurately. The solution involves integrating the potential and taking derivatives with respect to all spatial components. The conversation concludes with Sergio successfully deriving the expected electric field after clarifying the necessary steps.
sergioro
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A question involving the relationship between the electric
field E(r) and the electric potential V( r) is about computing the electric
field on the z-axis due to a uniform line charge distribution λ
spread out on a semicircle of radius R, lying on the first
half of the XY plane (0 ≤ θ ≤ π). A few points on the
semicircle are (x=R,y=0) at θ= 0, (x=0,y=R) at θ= π/2,
and (x=-R,y=0) at θ = π (I am using the symbol π as Pi).

Homework Equations



The electric potential V( r) is easily computed giving the result
V(z) = K*Q/Sqrt(z^2 + R^2). Q = λπR and K is the electric constant.

The Attempt at a Solution



The electric field is suppose to be
obtained via E = - grad(V) = - d(V(z))/dz. But this relation leads only
to one component of the electric field.

Could somebody point out what is missing?

Sergio
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Sergio! Welcome to PF! :smile:
sergioro said:
The electric field is suppose to be
obtained via E = - grad(V) = - d(V(z))/dz.

No, the gradient of V is the vector (∂V/∂x,∂V/∂y,∂V/∂z) :wink:
 


sergioro said:
The electric potential V( r) is easily computed giving the result
V(z) = K*Q/Sqrt(z^2 + R^2). Q = λπR and K is the electric constant.
Yes, but only knowing the potential on the z axis is not enough information to compute the field there. You also need to know how the potential will change if you move some infinitesimal off that axis. Can you compute the full potential V=V(x,y,z)?
 


All right, haruspex . I see the point now. Some how I was mislead
by the textbook.

After writing the potential at any point in space (x,y,z) and
Leaving it in integral form, I then computed its derivatives
with respect to each one of the components of the field
point (x,y,z). Then, setting x=y=0 on each one,
integration respect to the source variable yields the expected answer.

Thanks,

Sergio
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top