The Electron - Size of Magnetic field vs Size of Electric field

Buckeye
Messages
164
Reaction score
2
What is the radius or effective scattering cross-section of the magnetic field of a free electron and what is the radius or effective scattering cross-section of the electric field of a free electron? Admittedly the two fields are different aspects of the EM field of the electron.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you separate these two cross sections in an experiment? A scattering cross section needs a reaction, so what would your reacton be or in other words, what is being scattered and by what? I am not sure I understand what you are asking and if I do, then your question may be ill-posed.

Are you trying to get a feel for the relative strength between them?
 
Norman said:
How do you separate these two cross sections in an experiment?
Good question. I'd love to know as well. Bohm (QT book) wrote that the magnetic field is roughly 100X smaller than the electric field, but I did not read if that was experimentally measured or estimated from a calculation.
Norman said:
A scattering cross section needs a reaction, so what would your reacton be or in other words, what is being scattered and by what? I am not sure I understand what you are asking and if I do, then your question may be ill-posed.
Sorry, but that's the best way I know how to put it.
Norman said:
Are you trying to get a feel for the relative strength between them?
Actually, I'm interested in the effective volume and the radial density of both. Does that help?
 
Ok, now we are getting somewhere. I think you are asking basically an classical electro/magnetostatics problem.

I will work it out and post what I get later tonight ok.
Cheers,
Ryan
 
By the way, the statement about the cross sections in completely meaningless since you must have some sort of scattering event to define the cross section. You are just looking for the ratio of the energy densities. Which will tell you something about their relative strengths.
 
Buckeye said:
Bohm (QT book) wrote that the magnetic field is roughly 100X smaller than the electric field, but I did not read if that was experimentally measured or estimated from a calculation.

at first glance this seems like it is very wrong. The magnetic field of the electron is due to the magnetic moment from the spin. Spin is a QM effect and therefore should be on the order of hbar which is very, very small. While the electric field is due to electrostatics and should be large when compared to hbar.

I would suggest openning your copy of Jackson and using the magnetic moment from spin to compute the magnetic energy density and then use standard electrostatics to compute the electric energy density. It should be very straight forward.

I will do it tonight or tomorrow morning.
Maybe someone else can weight in on this and see if my intuition is correct.
Cheers,
Ryan
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top