The h in mgh Can you change it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mental Gridlock
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding gravitational potential energy (PE) and how the height (h) affects it. When holding a cat ten meters above the ground, the potential energy is based on that height. If a boulder is placed beneath the cat, the height relative to the boulder is reduced to five meters, affecting the PE calculation. However, the overall potential energy remains the same when considering the change in height from the original reference point. Ultimately, the reference point for height can be adjusted, but only changes in potential energy matter for calculations.
Mental Gridlock
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
The "h" in mgh.. Can you change it?

Okay I still can't get my head around the idea of gravitational potential energy. I think that having questions answered may help my understanding.

Cats usually always land on their feet, so I'll use one for my example.

1) I hold the cat ten meters off the ground I'm standing on. h is 10 meters, right?

2) I place a boulder beneath the cat, which takes up five meters. The cat is five meters above that. The h for his gravitational potential energy is half, right? He can only fall five meters now? Or is it still ten meters?

3) I put the cat back where he was, ten meters up, but now I dig a hole, straight down into the ground, ten meters deep. If I release the cat he'll fall twenty meters. Did my digging that hole give the cat additional potential energy, without even moving the cat?

I'm probably misunderstanding something. Thank you for any answers and answers may prompt more questions.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You would be considering the change in potential energy or the potential energy relative to a reference point.

So in the first case, this is 10 m from the surface on which you are standing, so the change in PE is mgΔh = mg(10-0).

In the second case, relative to the ground, the cat is still Δh= 10 m. Relative to the surface of the boulder Δh = 10-5 = 5 so the energy relative to the boulder is halved.

Basically, you need to consider the change in energy.
 
You are free to set your h=0 line wherever you want. It is only changes in PE that are important here. For your second example the change in PE will be the same if you say that the cat falls from h=10 to h=5 or if you say that it falls from h=5 to h=0. Or you could even have it fall from h=0 to h=-5. All of those will give you the same answer.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top