The Hamiltonian vs. the energy function

Loxias
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The mechanics of a system are described by the Lagrangian:
L = \frac{1}{2}\dot{x}^2 + \dot{x}t

Homework Equations



(a) Write the Energy (Jacobi function) for the system.
(b) Show that \frac{dh}{dt} \neq \frac{\partial h}{\partial t}
(c) Write an expression for the Hamiltonian of the system.
(d) Recall that \frac{dH}{dt} = \frac{\partial H}{\partial t} allways.
explain why\frac{dH}{dt} = \frac{\partial H}{\partial t}, \frac{dh}{dt} \neq \frac{\partial h}{\partial t} , even though H and h are equal in value.


The Attempt at a Solution



a. \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}} = \dot{x} + t
and we get
h = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}}\dot{x} - L = \frac{1}{2}\dot{x}^2

b. \frac{\partial h}{\partial t} = 0, \frac{dh}{dt} \dot{x}\ddot{x}

c. This is what I don't understand..
They both have the same expression... what is the difference between the two sections..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah, but they don't have the same expression. The Hamiltonian (H) is written in terms of the q's and p's, while the pre-Hamiltonian (h) is written in terms of q's and \dot{q}'s. Because of that little change, there is a difference.

In this case,

<br /> h(x,\dot{x},t)=\frac{1}{2}\dot{x}^2<br />

while

<br /> H(x,p_x,t)=\frac{1}{2}\left(p_x-t\right)^2<br />

where we used the Legendre transform (part a) to get the momentum (recall p_q=\partial L/\partial\dot{q}).
 
Thank you for clarifying this.
Could you elaborate more about what you meant with the legendere transform?
 
Sure. The Legendre transform is a mathematical operation that transforms one set of coordinates into another set. In the case of Hamiltonian mechanics, you are turning velocity coordinates (\dot{q}) into momentum coordinates (p):

<br /> p_q=\frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot{q}}<br /> [/itex]
 
Thanks :smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top