The internsity of a particular earthquake wave

  • Thread starter Thread starter klmdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earthquake Wave
AI Thread Summary
The intensity of an earthquake wave is measured at 2.2 * 10^6 W/m^2 at 100 km from the source, and the discussion focuses on calculating the intensity at 4 km from the source. It is suggested that the intensity increases as the distance decreases due to the wave's energy spreading over a larger area, following the formula I = P/A. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding whether the source is on the surface or underground, as this affects calculations. To find the total power passing through an area of 5.0 m^2 at 4 km, one can use the derived intensity and multiply it by the area. The discussion highlights the need for clarity on the source's depth to accurately solve the problem.
klmdad
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
:confused: The internsity of a particular earthquake wave is measured to be 2.2 * 10^6 W/m^2 at a distance of 100km from the source. Now here is the part that I'm lost. What was the intensity when it passed a point only 4.0km from the source? And what was the total power passing through an area of 5.0m^2 at a distance of 4.0km?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can make two different assumptions. that the earthquake's power spreads out from a point on the earth. The power density gets lower and lower the farther you go from the source. This is more then likely what the question is asking for.

If you have a class that likes to pull very hard problems out of nowhere if could be that you have assume that source is a certain distance underground. Then the power dissipation would that follow an easy r^2 or r^3 route. Easiest way to do this would be using spherical coordinates. If you have not used spherical coordinates yet I highly doubt this is the question they are asking.

If I were you I would solve it assuming the source of the earthquake was on the surface. All the power in a 100km radius from the source would then also be present at 4 km away from the source but the perimeter of the circle is smaller so the power density will be higher.
 
I'm still trying to understand your reply to my Question. If this will helps you to help me it has to do with energy transported by waves. As the wave moves outward, the energy it carries is spread over a larger and larger area since the surface area of asphere of radius r is 4pir^2. Thus the intensity of a wave is I = P/A = P/4pir^2 if we consider two points at distances r1 and r2 from the source then I1 = P/4pir1^2 and I2 = P/4pir2^2, so I2/I1 = r1^2/r2^2
 
In your original question it was unclear weather you would be dealing with a 2 dimensional problem or a three dimensional problem.

Your second post indicates it is a three dimensional problem deal with a sphere rather then a circle.

What is still unclear is if 100 km is through the ground or over the surface of the ground. This makes a difference since you do not say the depth of the source.

Is the source considered on the surface of the Earth or some distance inside the earth?

From you second post it seems like you know how to correlate a power density from one radius to another, if this is so what difficulty are you having with the problem:?
 
where I am having problems with is what was the total power passing through an area of 5.0 m^2 at a distance of 4.0 km. I don't see how to work the problem.
 
You came up with the equation "I2/I1 = r1^2/r2^2", and you know r1 and r2 100km and 4 km and you know I1. So you can solve for I2. Now I2 would be in units of [W/m^2]. You know how many watts per square meter there are, so know all you need to do is figuare out how many watts there are in 5 metters squared.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top