- 11,326
- 8,752
This video is very enjoyable. It analyzes the apparent trajectory of JWST as seen from Earth. It's a good reminder of how inadequate our simple mental models of orbits, trajectories, and frames of reference are.
If the telescope rotates with respect to the sun-shield, then the secondary mirror will be in sunlight. Please explain in detail.mfb said:Momentum flap deployed, sunshield cover removed. We are passing many of the single points of failure now.
The cold side has warmed up a bit since my last post, it's now -45 degrees at the mirror and -145 degrees at the instruments. I expect it to cool down again once the sunshield deployment starts.The telescope part rotates/tilts, the sunshield part stays where it is because it needs to keep shielding the Sun. Reaction wheels take care of that.
An L2 halo orbit has to be perpendicular to the L2/Sun direction because only these two dimensions are an attractive potential. You can't orbit L2 along the L2/Sun direction. About 800,000 km, as you can find on the Wikipedia page.
all 107 membrane release devices associated with the sunshield deployment — every single one of which had to work in order for the sunshield to deploy — have now successfully released.
We are getting through all the scary parts, and it's going great!mfb said:The requirement to stay in the shadow limits the observable range in the sky. Here is a discussion and here are more technical details (PDF download). Within +-5 degrees of roll the sunshade can keep its 3D orientation, for more it has to rotate around the JWST/Sun axis. It keeps its orientation relative to the Sun independent of the pitch angle.
New blog updates:
Webb Ready for Sunshield Deployment and Cooldown
First of Two Sunshield Mid-Booms Deploys
With Webb’s Mid-Booms Extended, Sunshield Takes Shape
The sunshield is now fully extended. It's not under tension yet, but it's enough to cool down the telescope side significantly. Tensioning the five layers will take at least two days.
That's a massive chunk of single points of failures:
If I am picturing correctly, the flap corrects for pitch. But I don't really know. It is a very interesting concept if one thinks about it.KurtLudwig said:If the telescope rotates with respect to the sun-shield, then the secondary mirror will be in sunlight. Please explain in detail.
If the telescope tilts, it and the secondary mirror will still be shielded.
I think it's all scary. Until data arrives at Earth with the expected quality, it ain't over.valenumr said:We are getting through all the scary parts, and it's going great!
Can you hold your breath for 5 months until the temperature stabilizes?JLowe said:Until data arrives at Earth with the expected quality, it ain't over.
Is this an issue?mfb said:Deployment Timeline Adjusted as Team Focuses on Observatory Operations
They focus on the electrical system before tensioning the sunshield (no earlier than Jan 3).
The mirror temperature dropped to -116 C and the instrument data point has reached -192 C (81 K).
Looking at this "top" view, my understanding is that the telescope tilts to get pointing in one axis (equivalent to altitude in an Earth-bound alt-az telescope), and that the entire telescope+sunscreen rotates around the axis pointing at the sun to get pointing in the other axis (equivalent to azimuth).KurtLudwig said:If the telescope rotates with respect to the sun-shield, then the secondary mirror will be in sunlight. Please explain in detail.
The opening sentence in the linked article says "Taking advantage of its flexible commissioning schedule" That doesn't sound like an issue to me.pinball1970 said:Is this an issue?
Where's Webb and links not working for me. A few things on YT mentioned the same thing but I prefer to get it from the horses mouth. At least from someone who understands the horse.anorlunda said:The opening sentence in the linked article says "Taking advantage of its flexible commissioning schedule" That doesn't sound like an issue to me.
I just checked, and it's working for me...pinball1970 said:Where's Webb and links not working for me.
Nothing Wrong with link, it's my deviceberkeman said:I just checked, and it's working for me...
It probably means some sensor reading was different from the expectation and they spent another day understanding this. Not unusual with such a complex device.pinball1970 said:Is this an issue?
This critical step in the observatory’s complex sequence of deployments resumed after Webb mission managers paused deployment operations on Saturday to allow for team rest, and then again on Sunday to make adjustments to Webb’s power subsystem and to alter the observatory’s attitude to lower the temperature of the motors that drive the tensioning process.

That's a relief. They can now, at least use it for something to justify its existence. Things can only get better.mfb said:Secondary mirror deployed
It's now a telescope.
So it can still work/semi work like this? If the Primary mirror fails?sophiecentaur said:That's a relief. They can now, at least use it for something to justify its existence. Things can only get better.
The backplane will hold the weight of the mirror and carry 5,300 pounds of telescope optics and instruments. PMBSS stands 24 feet tall, is nearly 20 feet wide and weighs 2,180 pounds. As the names suggests, it supports the primary mirror as well as Webb’s instruments, the center section and the wing assemblies — which weigh more than 7,300 pounds combined, more than three times the weight of the backplane itself.
Another wrinkle of development and testing was ensuring that while the telescope’s 18 mirrors move, the backplane remains steadier than a surgeon’s hand, especially because no operating room is as cold as space. The team demonstrated to NASA that PMBSS should not vary more than 38 nanometers — about 1/1,000 the diameter of a human hair — keeping the mirror stable, Atkinson said. To put that into scale, if JWST’s mirrors were as large as the distance between New York and Los Angeles, the tolerance error of movement from the backplane could be no more than one inch.
Indeed.phyzguy said:@KurtLudwig , here is some more detail on your question about Webb pointing. If it points straight "up" relative to the sunshield, then the secondary will be in sunlight, as you said earlier. So the field of view at any point in time is limited to the swath shown in these figures, although over the course of the year it can see the entire sky. There is more discussion here:
https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/56076/why-does-jwst-have-such-a-big-blind-spot
So that's pretty good use of all the resources. No Earth-bound telescope can do that; they're all limited by their horizon and JW has (hopefully) many years to do the job. I hope all those Duracells will hold out.phyzguy said:So the field of view at any point in time is limited to the swath shown in these figures, although over the course of the year it can see the entire sky.