The Lagrangian/Hamiltonian dynamics of a particle moving in a manifold

vertices
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
I posted this problem on the Classical Mechanics Subforum last week but have not received many responses - hopefully someone can help here as I've spent hours racking my brain, trying to work this out!

Homework Statement



There is a particle of mass 'm' moving in a manifold with the following Lagrangian:

<br /> L={\frac{m}{2}}{g_{ij}(x)}.{\dot{x^{i}}{\dot{x^{j} }<br />

where

<br /> ds^{2}=g_{ij}(x)dx^{i}dx^{j}<br />

is the metric on M.

The question is to find the Equation of Motion - I need to work out:

<br /> {\frac{{\partial}L}{{\partial}{x^{i}}}<br />

in order to do this.

Homework Equations



To find EOM we need to set the the follow expression to 0:

<br /> {\delta}A=\int{dt[{\frac{{\partial}L}{{\partial}{x^{i}}}dx^{i}+\frac {{\partial}L}{{\partial}\dot{x^{i}}}d{\dot{x^{i}}]}=0<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



It took me a while but I understand why:

<br /> \frac{{\partial}L}{{\partial}\dot{x^{i}}}=mg_ {ij}x^{j}<br />

So that's fine.

Now I need to evaluate:

<br /> {\frac{{\partial}L}{{\partial}{x^{i}}}<br />

The issue is there is no term in x^i (the position) in the Lagrangian - it is only a function of the velocity \dot{x}^i. And also, why is g_{ij} = g_{ij}(x) - ie. a function of x - as I understand it, it is just a matrix of dim M with diag(-1,1,1,1,1,...).

FYI - the answer to my question should be:

{\frac{{\partial}L}{{\partial}{x^{i}}}= <br /> \frac{m}{2} {\partial}_i g_{jk} \dot{x}^{j}\dot{x}^{k} - ({\partial}_k g_{ij}) \dot{x}^{k}\dot{x}^{j} <br />
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the Powers That Be on this forum would rather you keep it there:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=366151
(unless it has been a homework problem all along, then it should have been posted here in the first place...) I'll take it up on that other thread.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top