The Law of Conservation Problem (Application)

AI Thread Summary
When a large superball and a small superball are dropped from the same height, the small ball rebounds to a height slightly less than the initial height. However, when the small ball is positioned above the large ball and both are dropped together, the small ball can rebound to a height significantly greater than the initial height. This phenomenon occurs because, upon rebounding, the large ball transfers energy and momentum to the small ball during their collision. As a result, the small ball gains additional energy, allowing it to reach a higher rebound height, while the large ball loses some energy and rebounds lower than before. This scenario illustrates the principles of conservation of energy and momentum in elastic collisions.
tmang
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1.A large superball and a small superball are dropped from the same initial height H. Both balls bounce back up to a height h , which is just a bit less than H. If, however, the small superball is placed immediately above the large superball and both are dropped to the ground simultaneously from height H, the small superball rebounds to a height h␣ >>> H! Explain this in terms of the Conservation Laws.
2. Conservation Laws
3.The small ball lands above the large ball. It ‘meets’ the large ball on its rebound, and so is given energy and
momentum by the large ball before it (the small ball) rebounds off the large ball and reverses its own direction.
I can only solve it partly.. Can someone please explain this and the answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The large ball rebounds from the ground as before so it has energy enough to get to the original rebound height of 'H'.

However, this time on the way up, it collides with the small ball, transferring some of it's energy to the small ball. (You can calculate exactly how much by treating it as a simple billiard ball collision with conservation of energy and momentum). Having lost that energy, it cannot bounce so high this time.

The smaller ball, just before the collision has enough energy to bounce back to the height h but it now gains the energy transferred to it by collision with the big ball and so has enough energy to get higher than before. You can show how much higher by noting that the extra K.E. now becomes Potential Energy.
 
ahh.. I get it now.. I was missing the key points of the Law of Conservation.. Thank you so much for your great help! thank you..
 
Y'r welcome :smile:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top