The lifeguard problem: find the direction of sprint.

  • Thread starter Thread starter tsuwal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the lifeguard problem, where a lifeguard at the origin aims to rescue a person at position (x,y) while considering soil and water velocities. The goal is to determine the optimal angle or point on the waterline (c) for the fastest rescue, adhering to Snell-Descartes law. Participants express frustration over the complexity of the resulting equations, noting that simplifying the expression for c in terms of other distances may not yield a clean solution. There is also confusion regarding the definitions of variables, specifically the velocities of the lifeguard on land (vp) and in water (vm). The conversation highlights the challenges of differentiation in optimizing the rescue path.
tsuwal
Messages
105
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This i the usual lifegard problem: we have a lifeguar that has a soil and water velocity, and wants to rescue a person at position (x,y). The lifeguard is ate the origin and th beach ends at position l, he wants to reach destination aa fast as possible.

We all know that this is accomplished by respecting the snell-descart law but what matters to the lifeguard is the angle he is going to run or the point in the waterline he is aiming, call it c.

2013-03-25 15.47.03.jpg



Homework Equations



Snell-Descarte law

The Attempt at a Solution



I made the calculations but the expressian became really ugly, can this expression simplify?

2013-03-25 15.46.46.jpg

 
Physics news on Phys.org
yeah, to be honest, I think a direct expression of C in terms of the other distances is going to be ugly, I don't think it will simplify into a nice expression.

I am trying to check your answer. So is vp the velocity of the man on ground? And vm the velocity of the man in water? I tried to work back from your answer, and I get to
\frac{x-c}{y-l} = \frac{y-l}{x-l} \frac{l}{c}
This doesn't make sense, so maybe it is worth checking through your working again?
 
Just a lot of yucky differentiation, right?

T1 = √[l2 + c2]1/2/v1
T2 = √[(y-l)2 + (x-c)2]/v2
d(T1+T2)/dc = 0 etc.
Yuck!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

Similar threads

Back
Top