The magnetic field strength required to oscillate an electron

AI Thread Summary
To determine the magnetic field strength required for an electron to circle with a radius of 0.1 m after being accelerated by a 1 V potential difference, the electron's speed is calculated to be approximately 5.93 x 10^5 m/s. The centripetal force acting on the electron is found to be 3.2 x 10^-18 Newtons. Using the formula B = qv/F, the magnetic field strength is estimated to be around 3 x 10^4 Tesla. The discussion emphasizes the importance of carrying units throughout calculations to avoid errors. Proper unit management is highlighted as crucial for verifying the correctness of equations and results.
cmcd
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"An electron is accelerated by a potential difference of 1 V and is injected into vacuum. How strong should the magnetic field in a vacuum be if you want the electron to circle along a loop with a radius of 10^-1m? Please indicate the direction of the magnetic field"




Homework Equations



PE = KE
for speed

F_centripetal =( mv^2) / r
for force

B = qv/F
for field strength




The Attempt at a Solution



v = sqrt(2qV/m)
v= 5.93 E5 m/s

F = 3.2 E-18 Newtons

B = 3 E4 Tesla
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not a textbook question...
 
cmcd said:

Homework Statement



B = qv/F
for field strength

Better check that one.
 
cmcd said:

Homework Statement



"An electron is accelerated by a potential difference of 1 V and is injected into vacuum. How strong should the magnetic field in a vacuum be if you want the electron to circle along a loop with a radius of 10^-1m? Please indicate the direction of the magnetic field"




Homework Equations



PE = KE
for speed

F_centripetal =( mv^2) / r
for force

B = qv/F
for field strength




The Attempt at a Solution



v = sqrt(2qV/m)
v= 5.93 E5 m/s

F = 3.2 E-18 Newtons

B = 3 E4 Tesla

rude man said:
Better check that one.

It is a good practice to carry units along for all quantities in all of your equations. If you had done so, you would have caught this error that rude man is pointing out...
 
I hope you listen to berkeman. There's nothing more important than carrying units along. Then you can check expressions term-by-term for agreement and the correctness of the answer. Which is (one reason) why I oppose using numbers instead of symbols until the very end, and why I abhor labeling e.g. a dependent voltage source as "10I" where I is current and the "10" is meant to be some impedance.
 
Back
Top