The Plane in the Wind Puzzle: Does a Constant Wind Affect the Round Trip Time?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter SchroedingersLion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane Puzzle Wind
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a brainteaser involving a plane traveling between two airports with and without the influence of a constant wind. Participants explore whether the presence of wind affects the total time taken for a round trip, considering various physical principles and interpretations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the round trip with wind takes longer because the wind decreases the plane's speed on the way back more significantly than it increases the speed on the way to the destination.
  • Another participant proposes that in the rest frame of the air, the plane maintains the same speed in both directions, prompting a consideration of the plane's speed relative to the ground.
  • A participant references the Michelson–Morley experiment, arguing that it demonstrates the irrelevance of wind direction on the round trip time, only the wind speed matters.
  • One participant calculates the time taken with wind by using the equations for tailwind and headwind, concluding that the total time is greater than without wind.
  • Another participant acknowledges the use of force balance equations but expresses uncertainty about how to incorporate power into the analysis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanics of the problem, with some supporting the idea that wind affects round trip time while others challenge the initial assumptions and calculations. No consensus is reached on the correct approach or conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential misunderstandings regarding the definitions of engine speed, the role of wind, and the application of force and power in the context of the problem.

SchroedingersLion
Messages
211
Reaction score
56
Hi everyone.

I came across the following brainteaser:
A plane travels from airport A to airport B and then returns to A from B. There is no wind, both trips follow a straight line, and the plane flies at constant engine speed.
Suppose now that a constant wind is blowing from A to B. Will the required time for the round trip change or will it remain the same?

If you want to think about it first, don't scroll down.
Solution and my question:The given solution is that the round trip with wind takes longer. While the wind decreases the plane's speed on the way to A by the same amount as it increases its speed on the way to B, the retardation on the way to A lasts a greater amount of time than the boost on the way to B.
As an intuitive explanation, one is supposed to imagine the situation in which the wind speed is equal to the engine speed. Then the plane would be able to reach B twice as fast, but would not move from its place on the way back.

I try to write down some basic mechanics to show this, but I embarassingly failed.
I take "engine speed" to mean that the engine runs at a certain power ##P_0##. Let the distance be given by ##s## and the time taken for the trip ##t_0 = t_{A,0}+t_{B,0}=2t_{A,0}##. The power is related to the velocity by ##v_0=P_0 / F_0## with the force that needs to be overcome ##F_0##, so that the needed time can be expressed as $$t_0=2t_{A,0}=2 \frac{s_A}{v_0}=2\frac{s}{P_0}F_{0}.$$
Now, let the wind blow from A to B. Can't I just model it as a constant force ##F_w## applied in that direction?
Then, the force from A to B with wind is ##F_{A,w}=F_0 - F_w##, and the force from B to A ##F_{B,w}=F_0 + F_w##.
Then, applying the formula above, the required time will be
$$t_w = t_{A,w} + t_{B,w} = \frac {s} {P_0} (F_{A,w} + F_{B,w}) = \frac {s} {P_0} *2F_0 = t_0. $$

Where is my error? Needless to say, it is pretty frustrating to study physics for years, obtain an MSc., only to fail on petty brainteasers that are not even meant to require a physics education:cry:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are over thinking it.

In the rest frame of the air the plane has the same speed ##v## in either direction, so if the wind speed is ##w## what's the speed relative to the ground in each direction?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and SchroedingersLion
SchroedingersLion said:
The given solution is that the round trip with wind takes longer. While the wind decreases the plane's speed on the way to A by the same amount as it increases its speed on the way to B, the retardation on the way to A lasts a greater amount of time than the boost on the way to B.
Doing the same thing with light instead of an airplane was the basis of the Michelson–Morley experiment which should have measured a greater round-trip time depending on the speed of the aether relative to the line connecting A and B. It didn't show this, which falsified the aether-wind kind of thinking that came from Newtonian physics.

The M-M experiment calculations show that it doesn't matter which way the wind was blowing, only the speed of it. So if A is say east of B, a west wind or a north wind will both add the same time to the duration of the round trip, and if the wind is as high as the airplane speed, the round trip cannot be done at all.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SchroedingersLion
OK, one can assume that the plane's engine speed ##v## is always measured relatively to the medium.
In that case, with tailwind, one has ##t_1=\frac {s}{v+w}## and with headwind ##t_1=\frac{s}{v-w} ##.
Adding them, one sees that the resulting time is larger than the time without wind, i.e. ##\frac {2s}{v}##.

No need to talk about power or forces...So, I assume that in my original post, the two equations ##F_{A,w}=F_0-F_w ## and ##F_{B,w}=F_0 + F_w ## are rubbish then.
 
I don't know that it's rubbish, since you would formally use some sort of force balance equation (cruising speed is the point at which engine thrust equals drag) to show that the airspeed is what they mean by "engine speed". But then I don't immediately see what you'd do with power after that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SchroedingersLion
Thanks Ibix!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
17K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K