The pressure term in Bernoulli's equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the pressure term in Bernoulli's equation, particularly in the context of fluid flow through a constriction. Participants explore the relationship between pressure, force, and area, and how these factors interact as fluid velocity changes. The conversation includes theoretical considerations and conceptual clarifications regarding the dynamics of fluid behavior in varying cross-sectional areas.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question how pressure can decrease when fluid flows through a constriction, suggesting that the force must decrease more significantly than the area to result in lower pressure.
  • Others clarify that the pressure decrease occurs after the velocity has increased due to the area reduction, indicating a trade-off between directional and random molecular velocities.
  • A participant introduces the idea that the converging walls exert a force on the fluid that must be overcome by upstream pressure.
  • There is a discussion about the distinction between dynamic pressure and static pressure, with some participants emphasizing the need to understand these terms in the context of Bernoulli's equation.
  • Some participants express confusion about how the pressure term, represented as force over area, changes as velocity varies, questioning whether force must decrease to maintain pressure balance.
  • One participant notes that the fluid accelerates as it moves from a larger to a smaller cross-section, implying that upstream pressure must be higher than downstream pressure to facilitate this acceleration.
  • Another participant mentions a frame invariant version of Bernoulli's equation that accounts for the effects of the converging wall on the flow.
  • There is a query regarding the representation of pressure in terms of mass and acceleration, with a participant seeking clarification on what exactly changes in this context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the relationship between pressure, force, and area, with no consensus reached on the specifics of how these factors interact in the context of Bernoulli's equation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these interactions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the relationships involved, including the effects of converging walls and the distinction between different types of pressure. There are unresolved questions about the mathematical representation of pressure and the dynamics of mass and acceleration in this context.

Since1333
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Seeing as P(F/A) + KE + PE = Constant, if the fluid's flowing through a constriction (So the area's decreasing(Which would net an overall larger pressure)), How does the pressure term decrease? Does the Force decrease even more greatly than the Area, to net an overall lower pressure?

Assuming we're going from a larger area, through a constriction, into a smaller area.

Just to note: I know it's decreasing because either the KE or PE are increasing, i understand that. I'm just confused as to if it's actually the Force(P=F/A) increasing/decreasing significantly to make up for the Area increase/decrease at points.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that the pressure decrease is where the velocity has already increased after the area decrease has already happened. So the pressure there is lower than the pressure that was pushing it into the constriction. The trade-off between average molecular velocity in the direction of flow and the average random molecular velocity that causes non-directional pressure can be imagined as a simple application of the Pythagorean Theorem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Since1333
FactChecker said:
Remember that the pressure decrease is where the velocity has already increased after the area decrease has already happened. So the pressure there is lower than the pressure that was pushing it into the constriction. The trade-off between average molecular velocity in the direction of flow and the average random molecular velocity that causes non-directional pressure can be imagined as a simple application of the Pythagorean Theorem.

Say we want to represent Pressure as Force/Area though, and the cross-sectional area of a (horizontal) pipe decreases(in this hypothetical situation), we will have a decrease in pressure (F/A in this situation), and an increase in velocity. So is force decreasing by a larger amount, to make up for the area that is also decreasing? (Otherwise, a smaller area would just net an even larger pressure(F/A))

Also thank you for your reply, i really appreciate the help
 
The converging walls are also exerting a force on the fluid in the direction opposite to its direction of flow. So the upstream pressure has to overcome this too.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
You should be careful about your terminology. The term "pressure" is used in different ways. There is dynamic pressure, d, and static pressure, s, which correspond to the kinetic and potential energy, respectively. They total to the total pressure, p = d + s. The connection between dynamic pressure, d, and velocity, v, is d = ½ρv2. In a steady-state condition, p is constant and the rate of material flowing through the tube at every point is equal. So the product of the area, A, and v is constant. You should be able to piece those facts together to get your equation.
 
So the P term in bernoulli's equation P+½ρv^2+ρgh=constant isn't the same type of pressure usually represented as P=F/A?
 
Since1333 said:
So the P term in bernoulli's equation P+½ρv^2+ρgh=constant isn't the same type of pressure usually represented as P=F/A?
Actually, that is exactly what it is.
 
Chestermiller said:
Actually, that is exactly what it is.
So when the pressure term increases/decreases from a change in velocity, the force(in the term P=F/A) would be considered to increase/decrease to overcome the new smaller/larger area, right?

My example thought is below:
If we were going from an area of low velocity, to high velocity, the pipe's cross-sectional area would be smaller, so for pressure to decrease the force term would have to decrease to overcome the new, smaller area. Otherwise the force over the new, smaller area, would just cause pressure to increase.

I'm just confused as to how the P term physically looks as it changes, as it's represented as F/A, if it's as simple as Force overcoming the change in area, or if I'm missing something
 
Last edited:
Since1333 said:
So when the pressure term increases/decreases from a change in velocity, the force(in the term P=F/A) would be considered to increase/decrease to overcome the new smaller/larger area, right?

My example thought is below:
If we were going from an area of low velocity, to high velocity, the pipe's cross-sectional area would be smaller, so for pressure to decrease the force term would have to decrease to overcome the new, smaller area. Otherwise the force over the new, smaller area, would just cause pressure to increase.

I'm just confused as to how the P term physically looks as it changes, as it's represented as F/A, if it's as simple as Force overcoming the change in area, or if I'm missing something
No. This is not the whole story. The fluid is accelerating as it flows from the larger cross section region to the lower cross section region. In order of this to happen, the upstream force must be higher than the downstream force. You know, Fnet = ma, right? But, the converging wall is pushing back on the fluid. This is part of the force balance too. However, the net effect is still that the upstream pressure must be higher than the downstream pressure. The combination of these factors is captured by the Bernoulli equation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Since1333
  • #10
Chestermiller said:
No. This is not the whole story. The fluid is accelerating as it flows from the larger cross section region to the lower cross section region. In order of this to happen, the upstream force must be higher than the downstream force. You know, Fnet = ma, right? But, the converging wall is pushing back on the fluid. This is part of the force balance too. However, the net effect is still that the upstream pressure must be higher than the downstream pressure. The combination of these factors is captured by the Bernoulli equation.
This is exactly what i was looking for, thank you.
 
  • #11
In case you're wondering about the effect of the converging wall pushing back on the flow, it's taken care of in the frame invariant version of Bernoulli's equation for constricted flow:

## p1 - p2 = \frac{\rho}{2} \ (v2 - v1)^2 \ ( \frac{a1 + a2}{a1 - a2} )##

http://www.loreto.unican.es/Carpeta2012/EJP%28Mungan%29Bernoulli%282011%29.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Since1333
  • #12
Actually, one more question. If we mathematically represent the P=(F/A) term as P=Mass*Acceleration/Area, what exactly would be increasing/decreasing? Does Mass increase/decrease at all? Or is it only acceleration increasing/decreasing?
 
  • #13
Since1333 said:
Actually, one more question. If we mathematically represent the P=(F/A) term as P=Mass*Acceleration/Area, what exactly would be increasing/decreasing? Does Mass increase/decrease at all? Or is it only acceleration increasing/decreasing?
You can't represent P = F/A = ma/A because F is not equal to ma. Fnet = ma, where Fnet is the NET force acting on a body. F = ma does not apply to each and every individual force acting on a body. How could a set of different forces all give the same acceleration?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K