The product between quaternion

  • Thread starter Thread starter HeilPhysicsPhysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product Quaternion
HeilPhysicsPhysics
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
For example:
i^2=?
j^2=?
k^2=?
ij=?
jk=?
ik=?
ijk=?
Is ij=ji?
And how to prove them?

And also,vector times vector, what is the product?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
HeilPhysicsPhysics said:
For example:
i^2=?
j^2=?
k^2=?
ij=?
jk=?
ik=?
ijk=?
Is ij=ji?
And how to prove them?

And also,vector times vector, what is the product?

This is from wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternions

i2 = j2 = k2 = ijk = -1
ij = k
jk = i
ki = j
ji = -k
kj = -i
ik = -j

The first one I think is the basic definition and the rest follow from that, some of the proofs are on the wikipedia page, and what do you mean by a vector times a vector? The above equalities allow a general definition of a product of quaternions.
 
Just like:
A=i+j+k
B=2i+3j-4k
They are both vector.
I heard that a vector times a vector become a tensor(rank two).
If ij=-k,ik=-j,jk=-i.
The product is:
(i+j+k)(2i+3j-4k)=-2-3k+4j-2k-3+4i-2j-3i+4=i+2j-5k-1
I think it is still a vector, not a tensor(rank two).
 
The product of two quaternions is still a quaternion (and quaternions are not vectors). You did the multiplication wrong up there, if A and B are as you had then AB is -7i + 6j + k - 1.

You can define many products between vectors, for example in \mathbb{R}^3 you have the usual cross and dot products (and the dot product generalizes to other spaces of course). Those two products can be read off the result of quaternion multiplication:

<1,1,1> \times <2,3,4> = <-7,6,1>

and

<1,1,1> \cdot <2,3,4> = 1 = -(-1).

In general if the product of two quaternions A = a_1 i + a_2 j + a_3 k and B = b_1 i + b_2 j + b_3 k is AB = C = c_1 i + c_2 j + c_3 k - c_4, then <a_1, a_2, a_3> \times <b_1, b_2, b_3> = <c_1, c_2, c_3> and <a_1, a_2, a_3> \cdot <b_1, b_2, b_3> = c_4.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top