The relationship between time taken per oscillation and mass

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an experiment measuring the time taken per oscillation of a ruler with attached weights. The original poster explores the relationship between mass and oscillation time, noting a potential proportionality to the square of the time taken based on their graphing results.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive a mathematical relationship between mass and time taken for oscillation, exploring various transformations of the time data and applying concepts from simple harmonic motion.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide feedback on the original poster's reasoning, suggesting improvements in notation and clarity. There is acknowledgment of the original poster's efforts, but no explicit consensus is reached regarding the correctness of the reasoning presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster's question may be better suited for a different section of the forum, indicating a potential mismatch in the discussion's context.

WaterMelllon1
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
In an experiment, a ruler is connected to the table and some weights are bounded to one end of the ruler. The ruler is then flicked and the time taken per oscillation is measured.

I have plotted a graph with the data I have collected, with the mass on the y-axis and time on x-axis. The graph produced appears to be a curve. I have tried altering the values on the x-axis; I have squared it, 1 over the square of it, square rooted it, and I found that the graph becomes linear when the values are squared. So the mass should be proportional to 1 over the square of the time taken.

I have tried finding out a mathematical relationship for this, but I am not sure if this is correct or not.

Well, if we make w=angular velocity, then w=θ/t, with θ being angular displacement and t being the time period. Since θ belongs in a circle, then it is safe to say that w=2π/t (?)

Also, if the force of an oscillation is proportional to -displacement (x), then it is true to say that F=-kx, with k being a constant.

Since F also = ma, then ma=-kx.

According the the simple harmonic wave equation for acceleration is a=-xw2sinwt. Since the formula for displacement(x) = x sinwt and a=-w2(x sinwt), then a=-xw2

So ma=-kx will become m(-xw2)=-kx, then using some algebra, m=k/w2. Since w=2π/t, then m=kT2/4π2.

Since k/4π2 is a constant, I can ignore that and say m is proportional to t2.

Is my reasoning true? I feel like I am wrong in quite a few spots.

Thanks for helping
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, this is essentially correct, but you take a few confusing steps because of a poor choice of notation. For instance, you use x to represent displacement as well as the amplitude (or maximum displacement). You should use different symbols for these - it will help keep things clear for you as well.

You write: x = x sin(wt), which looks nonsensical.

Better would be something like: x = A sin (wt), or x = x0 sin (wt).

Also, next time, a question like this is better suited for the Intro Physics section.
 
Thank you.
 
Yes thank you very much! It is so helpful!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K