Solving the Mystery of 3D Mechanics: Is the Sum of Moments 0?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanics of a rotating shaft with two strap-wheels of different diameters. Participants debate whether the sum of all moments at the center of the wheels is always zero, particularly when considering the angular rotation and net torque. It is clarified that since the shaft is in uniform circular motion, the assumption of zero net torque may not hold if the wheels can spin independently. The importance of understanding the relationship between the wheels and their diameters is emphasized, as it affects the lever arms and moments. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the complexity and depth of mechanical principles involved.
Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Femme_physics said:
Now does this mean that the sum of all moments on the center of perfect wheels is always 0?

Assuming the angular rotation of the wheel is zero, the the net torque is zero and the sum of the moments is zero.

Aren't A and C of different diameters? If so, the lever arms for T3 and T4 are different. That alters the diagram, but not the relationship.

It looks to me like you are treating the two wheels as one when seen in two dimensions. That would seem to assume that neither moves independently of the other. If they can spin freely the net moment need not be be zero.
 


Aren't A and C of different diameters? If so, the lever arms for T3 and T4 are different. That alters the diagram, but not the relationship.

You're right they're different diameters. It should be

http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/8756/bebebebebe.jpg

Ignoring the length of the vectors

Assuming the angular rotation of the wheel is zero, the the net torque is zero and the sum of the moments is zero.

I wasn't told anything about the angular rotation of the wheel. Actually, let me just write the question
"Shaft AD is supported by bearing D and B (the bearings don't have any pivotal forces) On the shaft are strap-wheels A and C. On the straps are acting forces as described in the drawing. The shaft is at uniform circular motion..
Given: Radius of wheel A is 50mm and radius of wheel C is 40mm"

Nothing about "angular rotation"

It looks to me like you are treating the two wheels as one when seen in two dimensions. That would seem to assume that neither moves independently of the other. If they can spin freely the net moment need not be be zero.

I see what you mean. But based on the question my assumption was correct, right? Since they're both attached to the same rotating shaft.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


There must be more to this question than you have let on?
 


Femme_physics said:
I wasn't told anything about the angular rotation of the wheel. Actually, let me just write the question
"Shaft AD is supported by bearing D and B (the bearings don't have any pivotal forces) On the shaft are strap-wheels A and C. On the straps are acting forces as described in the drawing. The shaft is at uniform circular motion..
Given: Radius of wheel A is 50mm and radius of wheel C is 40mm"

Nothing about "angular rotation"
You are told that the shaft undergoes uniform circular motion.
 


There must be more to this question than you have let on?

Yes posted just before you posted :)

You are told that the shaft undergoes uniform circular motion.

Ah, so that's the key! :) I see now! The principles of mechanics are seemingly infinite and interesting!

Thanks Doc, Fewmet, Studiot!
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top