The total travel time along a frictionless path?

jeebs
Messages
314
Reaction score
5
Hi,
I have this problem about an object moving along a track due to a uniform gravitational field. It moves from being at rest in the higher position A (xA,yA) to the lower position B (xB,yB). There is no friction at all. What I am supposed to be doing is showing that the total time from A to B is given by:

t_t_o_t = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2g}}\int dt \sqrt{\frac{(dx/dt)^2 + (dy/dt)^2}{y}}
where the limits of the integral are given as between (xA,yA) and (xB,yB).

The limits I do not quite understand, because surely they should really be times rather than positions if we are integrating with respect to time?

Anyway, what I have attempted is this:
From Newton's equation of motion, v2 = u2 + 2as, if we set initial velocity u = 0, gravitational acceleration a = g and vertical displacement s = y, then we have an expression for the object's final velocity, v = \sqrt{2gy}.

Also, I said that the instantaneous velocity will be given by v_i = \sqrt{(dx/dt)^2 + (dy/dt)^2}.

Since these two things match the denominator and numerator in the integrand respectively, they must be important. Clearly vi/v = 0 at time t=0 and position A, and increases to vi/v = 1 at time t=ttot and position B.


This is where I start to hit trouble though. I'm not really sure what to make of these spatial limits and I can't see the way forward. One thing I have tried is to say that

(\sqrt{(dx/dt)^2 + (dy/dt)^2})dt = \sqrt{dt^2(dx/dt)^2 + dt^2(dy/dt)^2} = \sqrt{(dx)^2 + (dy)^2} = dy\sqrt{(dx/dy) + 1}

but when I proceed with the integral integrating with respect to y from there, I end up with a quantity that does not have dimensions of time.

Can anyone steer me in the right direction?
Many thanks to those who try.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the direction of the instantaneous velocity

v_i

and compare with your final velocity direction

v

If the dt outside the square root is moved inside the square root, as you have shown, what are the units of the integrand? Then determine the units of

\frac{1}{\sqrt{2g}}

You should find the units of the expression is time.
 
Start out with ds=vdt. From this it follows that t=\int \frac{ds}{v}. You know that ds=\sqrt{dx^2+dy^2} which you can rewrite to something in terms of dt as you have already shown in your last line of equations. Now you just have to calculate v. Hint: use conservation of energy.
 
Cyosis said:
Start out with ds=vdt. From this it follows that t=\int \frac{ds}{v}. You know that ds=\sqrt{dx^2+dy^2} which you can rewrite to something in terms of dt as you have already shown in your last line of equations. Now you just have to calculate v. Hint: use conservation of energy.

Thanks guys.

What I've tried now is this:-
In the equation ds = vdt, this velocity is not a final or initial velocity as are used in Newton's equations of motion, it is some instantaneous velocity v=v(t) = v(y).

Also, kinetic energy Ek = 0.5mv2 and potential energy Ep = -mgy.

Potential energy is at a maximum of zero when the object is at its highest, and as it falls along its path it becomes more negative. At t=0, velocity is also 0, so that the sum of the kinetic and potential energies is zero, ie. Ek + Ep = 0, which is a constant.

This means that at some downwards displacement y, we have 0.5mv2 - mgy = 0 at all times. This leads directly to v=(2gy)1/2, which then slots into my final expression for t=ttot.

Am I justified in saying this?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top