The weak force, first step of nuclear fusion in the Sun

Click For Summary
The discussion clarifies a common misconception about nuclear fusion in the Sun, specifically regarding the transformation of protons into neutrons during proton-proton fusion. It confirms that a helium-2 nucleus, or diproton, is unstable, necessitating the conversion of one proton into a neutron for fusion to occur. The participants also address a labeling error in a textbook illustration, where the quark composition of protons and neutrons was incorrectly depicted. The correct configuration for a proton is two up quarks and one down quark, while a neutron consists of one up quark and two down quarks. Overall, the conversation enhances understanding of the weak force's role in fusion and corrects a visual misrepresentation in educational materials.
bluejello
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi. I need help please with a textbook illustration that has confused me.

Is the caption a typo? Should be "neutrons into protons" instead?

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • 1386275750809.jpg
    1386275750809.jpg
    50.3 KB · Views: 969
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The illustration is correct. A helium-2 nucleus, aka a diproton, is not stable, so when two protons collide in the core of the Sun, one of them MUST be turned into a neutron in order for proton-proton fusion to work. Most collisions between protons do not result in fusion. It is only on the very rare occasions that the weak force is able to turn one of the protons into a neutron that fusion occurs.

See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton-proton_chain_reaction
 
Hello,

Thank you for your help. I understand now that it's protons to neutrons.

My confusion stemmed from the placement of the quarks. Is the proton on the left incorrectly labeled with two down quarks and one up quark--should have two up and one down? Vice versa for the neutron on the right?

Thanks.
 
bluejello said:
My confusion stemmed from the placement of the quarks. Is the proton on the left incorrectly labeled with two down quarks and one up quark--should have two up and one down? Vice versa for the neutron on the right?.
Yep, you're right. The picture has it backwards!
 
Bill_K said:
Yep, you're right. The picture has it backwards!

Oh wow, I didn't even notice, lol.
 
Oh good, I felt stumped. Nice relief.

Thank you, both!
 
Hi, I saw someone with an avatar on a different forum that turns out to be the sombrero galaxy. AI says, too distant to know much about, aside from billions of starts, potentially tons of planets, and a supermassive black hole in the center. I find that setup fascinating, despite knowing close to nothing about the universe. So I ask: could anyone point me in the direction of, or provide information about this galaxy? I do not trust AI beyond general information, and I like to go pretty...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K