Theorem of existence and unicity.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lengalicious
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Existence Theorem
Lengalicious
Messages
162
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the following case: x'(t) = log (3t (x(t) - 2)) does the theorem of existence and unicity guarantee a unique solution for the initial value problem x(3) = 5, justify your answer?

Homework Equations


x'(t) = log (3t (x(t) - 2))

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok what I would do is take the domain of f(x,t) and the domain of ∂f(x,t)/∂x and then find the common interval and if the initial value problem is within this interval then there is a unique solution. However there is x(t) and t in the function so I don't understand how to find the domain?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For what x and t is that function, log(3t(x- 2), continuous and differentiable? What is the largest interval containing (3, 5) on which the function is continuous and differentiable?
 
Yeh, how would I find that out? Thats what I'm confused about.

EDIT: Would I just plug numbers into the x and t? Until I got an x and t that came up with 'Math error'? Because if that's the case then when t = 0 the function is discontinuous and when x = 2? Am I right?
and then the partial derivative is 3t/(3t(x-2)) = 1/(x-2) in which case x cannot equal 2 and t is eqal to all real numbers? So the common intervals are x cannot = 2 and t cannot = 0, with intial values t_0 = 3 and x_0 = 5 which are within the common intervals, therefore there is a unique solution? On a side note, should i have taken the partial derivative with respect to t or x? Or do I take partial derivative with respect to both and then compare all 3 intervals.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top