Theoretical question about wingless flight with a flight pack

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tabaristiio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flight Theoretical
AI Thread Summary
A power-to-weight ratio above 1.0 is necessary for a wingless flight pack to achieve horizontal flight. The horizontal thrust can be calculated using the Pythagorean theorem, where total thrust and weight are the key variables. For a combined weight of 300 pounds, a thrust of just over 301 pounds allows for slight horizontal movement. The discussion highlights that while humans can achieve horizontal speeds, such as a skydiver's 19 m/s, their efficiency as lifting bodies is limited. Overall, achieving effective horizontal flight with a jetpack involves careful consideration of thrust and weight dynamics.
Tabaristiio
Messages
61
Reaction score
2
What is the power to weight ratio required from a wingless augmented portable flight pack (jetpack) so that it can enable flight horizontally?

Assume that the jetpack and the user both weigh 300 pounds combined.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Well, if the power to weight ratio is above 1.0, it can fly horizontally. How fast horizontally depends on the ratio.

The horizontal component of thrust that is possible is given by the Pythagorean theorem, where the total thrust is the hypotenuse and the weight is one vertical side:
$$F = \sqrt{T^2-W^2}$$
where ##F## is the horizontal thrust, ##T## is the total thrust, and ##W## is the total weight.

So if the jet pack thrusted just 301 pounds, it could be tilted ever so slightly to impart a slight horizontal force to propel the wearer horizontally, but slowly.
 
I doubt humans make very good "lifting bodies" so +1 to what Anachronist said.
 
CWatters said:
I doubt humans make very good "lifting bodies" so +1 to what Anachronist said.

I guess it depends on what you mean by very good. A skydiver can reach horizontal speeds of 19 m/s while vertical speed is about 72 m/s, is that bad, good? Not good enough to land I suppose :-(

Cheers
 
Any glide slope less than 1:1 isn't even bad.
 
  • Like
Likes cosmik debris
CWatters said:
Any glide slope less than 1:1 isn't even bad.
That depends on the speed at which you hit the ground. :)
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top