There are two charges with charge q and mass m

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, the concept of equilibrium is clarified, emphasizing that it means the net force acting on the charges is zero. The relationship between electrostatic force and gravitational force is highlighted, with the teacher indicating that the electrostatic force (F) equals the gravitational force (mg) when the charges are in equilibrium. Participants are encouraged to consider all forces acting on the particles in the diagram for a complete analysis. The importance of vector addition in visualizing the forces is also mentioned. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving problems related to charged particles in equilibrium.
Abhishek Das
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
There are two charges with charge q and mass m and they are in equilibrium. Then, in the diagram why is my teacher saying that electrostatic force(F)=mg? Below is diagram.
HligTNMrjbquMH3pO78b-yP0kzKbEocKeoElM55wdsd2SCLJ6uBgCnP8I5bFn1YdQdXBTeQeeh041rGwng=w1177-h662-no.jpg


 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF! When posting a question, please follow the guidelines and fill out all parts of the question template. See https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/guidelines-for-students-and-helpers.686781/

OK, you've started with a diagram that correctly shows the gravity force and the electric force. It might help to also show any other forces acting on the particle.

What does "equilibrium" mean in terms of the forces?
 
Equilibrium means net force is zero, right?
 
Abhishek Das said:
Equilibrium means net force is zero, right?
Yes. That's right. If you added (head-to-tail) the force vectors acting on the particle, what would the diagram look like?
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Capacitors, equipotentials, and electric fields
Replies
5
Views
896
Charge conservation for 3 parallel charged plates
Replies
19
Views
1K
Why is source force + electrostatic force = 0 inside battery?
Replies
10
Views
1K
Potential energy of an electrostatic system in equilibrium
Replies
14
Views
1K
How to understand the direction of tension in a charged closed ring?
Replies
11
Views
719
Mechanisms Involved When Charging a Battery
Replies
10
Views
1K
Electrostatic force on a test charge by uniformly charged annular disc
Replies
1
Views
691
Use of imaginary charge vs Gauss' law
Replies
12
Views
900
Force between point charges at the center of two spherical shells
Replies
4
Views
2K
Point charge with very thin metal sheet along a spherical surface
Replies
21
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top