Thermal Physics: Fermi Gas and chemical potential

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 5K views
WWCY
Messages
476
Reaction score
15
Hi all, I have an issue trying to understand the following paragraph from Blundell's book.

Screenshot 2019-03-17 at 9.16.08 PM.png


How, exactly, does the definition of ##\mu_0 = E_F## "make sense"? In the sentence after 30.21, it seems to say that the mean energy for a system with ##N## particles differs from that of a system with ##N-1## particles by the highest occupy-able energy level at ##T = 0##, which is ##E_f##. What does this mean?

Many thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2019-03-17 at 9.16.08 PM.png
    Screenshot 2019-03-17 at 9.16.08 PM.png
    53.4 KB · Views: 983
Physics news on Phys.org
The chemical potential can be seen as the (Gibbs free) energy per particle, or the energy necessary to add one more particle to the system. With fermions at T = 0, all states up to ##E_F## are occupied, therefore the next fermion will add an energy of ##E_F## to the system. It does make sense to equate ##\mu(T=0) = E_F##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWCY