Thermal Probability and Trig integrals <3

sugar_scoot
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Given the number of molecules hitting unit area of a surface per second with speeds between v and v +dv and angles between \theta and d\theta to the normal is

\frac{1}{2} v n f(v)dv sin \theta cos \theta d\theta

show that the average value of cos \theta for these molecules is \frac{2}{3}.

I have convinced myself the answer is 4/3 instead. Can anyone show me where I am wrong?
I used P(cos \theta) = sin \theta cos \theta

Then I normalized:
1 = c \int^{\pi}_{0} sin \theta cos \theta d\theta
so that:
c = 2

<cos \theta> = 2 \int^{\pi}_{0} sin \theta cos^{2}\theta d \theta = 2 (2/3) = 4/3
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sugar_scoot said:
Given the number of molecules hitting unit area of a surface per second with speeds between v and v +dv and angles between \theta and d\theta to the normal is

\frac{1}{2} v n f(v)dv sin \theta cos \theta d\theta

show that the average value of cos \theta for these molecules is \frac{2}{3}.

I have convinced myself the answer is 4/3 instead. Can anyone show me where I am wrong?
I used P(cos \theta) = sin \theta cos \theta

Then I normalized:
1 = c \int^{\pi}_{0} sin \theta cos \theta d\theta
so that:
c = 2

<cos \theta> = 2 \int^{\pi}_{0} sin \theta cos^{2}\theta d \theta = 2 (2/3) = 4/3

Integrating from 0 to \pi overcounts the number of particles by a factor of 2. You only integrate from the normal to the plane, which is 0 to \pi/2. Your normalization integral actually vanishes as written.
 
Thank you.

Is there an intuitive reason why normalization is unnecessary in this case? Should I continue to attempt normalization as a first step in problems like these?
 
Actually I just did the problem over again with the new integration limits and although my <cos\theta> is now correct, I still found a normalization constant of 2.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top